The Daily Telegraph

Harry Mount on William’s loving tribute to his father

Combining family heritage and popular appeal, ‘Louis’ was the ideal choice, writes Harry Mount

- Harry Mount is author of ‘How England Made the English’ (Viking)

All hail Louis Arthur Charles. After keeping the world on tenterhook­s for almost five days, the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge have announced the name of their newest arrival. And what a lovely name it is. It is the perfect riposte to those who have, rather unkindly, suggested in recent days that there is some sort of animosity between the Duke and Prince Charles. The grandfathe­r-of-three has been prevented from rushing to his son’s side to coo over the baby by royal duty in Scotland, something that is soon to be remedied. It is hard to imagine a more beautiful tribute to your father than naming your son after him, not once but twice.

The Prince of Wales’s full moniker is Charles Philip Arthur George – so memorably mixed up by Princess Diana at their wedding in 1981, when she called him, at the altar, Philip Charles Arthur George.

Just as Charles was given his father’s name, William has now carried on that tender tradition and bestowed two of his father’s names – Charles and Arthur – on little Louis.

And the show of affection towards Prince Charles doesn’t stop there. Louis – or His Royal Highness Prince Louis of Cambridge, to give him his official title – is a heart-warming nod to the man Prince Charles loved more than any other: his great-uncle, Louis Mountbatte­n. It also features in William’s full name (William Arthur Philip Louis) and four-year-old Prince George’s (George Alexander Louis).

Louis Mountbatte­n – more correctly 1st Earl Mountbatte­n of Burma (1900-79) – was the Supreme Allied Commander of South-east Asia Command in the Second World War, the last Viceroy of India in 1947 and, later, the First Sea Lord.

He was also a supreme operator – perhaps the supreme operator – in royal circles. It was Mountbatte­n who helped to orchestrat­e successful­ly the marriage between Prince Philip, his nephew, and Princess Elizabeth in 1947; and Mountbatte­n who advised his great-nephew Prince Charles on all things formal and informal.

Both Philip and Charles were devastated when, in 1979, Mountbatte­n and his grandson Nicholas were murdered by the IRA, which had planted a bomb in their fishing boat in County Sligo.

When Prince William was born, three years later, that brutal act was still strong in Charles’s mind – thus the tribute in his son and heir’s name.

These days, of course, Louis is also a hip Sloane name, familiar in prep school playground­s across west London. In recent years, it has been a consistent­ly popular British choice, wavering between 61st and 71st in the name charts over the past decade.

Arthur, meanwhile, has soared more than 200 places up the rankings to number 30. The name means “bear” and also resonates with the mythical King Arthur and his Knights of the Round Table. Charles, incidental­ly, means “man” or “warrior”, and has a

long royal lineage (even if Charles I met a somewhat grisly end – and the monarchy, temporaril­y, with him).

Some commentato­rs have suggested that the new royal baby name has been given in a last-ditch attempt to advertise the Cambridges’ street credibilit­y before Meghan-mania sweeps the land on May 19.

Nothing could be further from the truth. From childhood, Prince William has always been the steady-as-he-goes, straight-down-the-middle prince; while Prince Harry has been Hal, roister-doistering with his school chums before settling into a life of military service.

But, still, isn’t Louis a bit, well, French? It casts the mind back to rather awkward days for royal families: the French Revolution in 1789 and Louis XVI, who lost his head to the guillotine four years later.

The name is certainly French in origin, meaning “famous in battle”. But our Royal family have been using it regularly for more than a century – and, like so many of our royal traditions, its popularity lies with the German monarchy, which favoured it as long ago as the 15th century.

When Louis Mountbatte­n was born in 1900 at Frogmore House in the shadow of Windsor Castle, he was actually called His Serene Highness Prince Louis of Battenberg.

It was only in 1917 – with public awkwardnes­s at the German blood of our royals during the First World War – that the name Battenberg was changed to Mountbatte­n (“berg” being German for “mount”). Still, Mountbatte­n understand­ably kept his first name, Louis – also the name of his father, and great-grandfathe­r.

SJ Strum, a baby names expert on the website channelmum.com, says: “William and Kate are mindful of their royal responsibi­lities and have selected a name which works on three levels – as a suitably grand royal name, on the internatio­nal stage as the new Prince will be known across the globe, and also as a moniker which is already popular in playground­s and matches their desire to give their children as ‘normal’ a childhood as possible.”

So, the besotted new parents have alighted on a name that squares the royal circle.

It is fashionabl­e, sentimenta­l and noble at the same time. And one that will please little Louis’s royal grandfathe­r immensely.

The name is certainly French in origin, but our Royal family have been using it for more than a century

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? FINAL
FINAL
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Above, baby Louis. Clockwise from top left, Charles with his sons in 2004; with Lord Mountbatte­n in 1979; with Diana, Princess of Wales and Wiliam in 1982; the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge this week
Above, baby Louis. Clockwise from top left, Charles with his sons in 2004; with Lord Mountbatte­n in 1979; with Diana, Princess of Wales and Wiliam in 1982; the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge this week
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom