Conservation increases danger of lyme disease
A NEW study, published by the Royal Society, has found some types of conservation action could increase the abundance of ticks, which transmit diseases such as lyme disease.
The research, led by the University of Glasgow in collaboration with the James Hutton Institute and Scottish Natural Heritage, examined how conservation management activities could affect tick populations, wildlife host communities, the transmission of the Borrelia bacteria that can cause lyme disease and, ultimately, the risk of contracting it.
The study found that managing the environment for conservation and biodiversity has many positive effects, including benefits for human health and wellbeing from spending time in nature.
However, the researchers suggested that there should be consideration of disease vectors such as ticks and mosquitoes in conservation management decisions.
Lead author Dr Caroline Millins, from the University of Glasgow’s School of Veterinary Medicine and Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine (BAHCM), said: ‘ We identified several widespread conservation management practices which could affect lyme disease risk: the management of deer populations, woodland regeneration, urban greening and control of invasive species.
‘We found that some management activities could lead to an increased risk of lyme disease by increasing the habitat available for wildlife hosts and the tick vector. These activities were woodland regeneration and biodiversity policies which increase the amount of forest bordering open areas as well as urban greening.
‘However, if deer populations are managed alongside woodland regeneration projects, this can reduce tick populations and the risk of lyme disease.’
Deer are often key to maintaining tick populations, but do not become infected with the bacteria.
Research by co-author Professor Lucy Gilbert of the James Hutton Institute’s Ecological Sciences group has focused on the roles of deer management, woodland expansion and other environmental factors in contributing to tick populations and lyme disease risk.
Professor Gilbert commented: ‘Our research so far demonstrates a clear relationship between deer densities and tick abundance in Scotland, and that deer management can help reduce ticks.
‘However, deer do not transmit the lyme disease bacteria (Borrelia), so current work at the Hutton Institute is testing for lyme disease risk at a lot of sites with widely varying deer densities to test the impact of deer densities on lyme disease risk.’
Senior author Dr Roman Biek, University of Glasgow’s BAHCM, added: ‘Widespread management activities can potentially teach us a lot about how changes to the environment can affect the chances of humans coming into contact with ticks and with the pathogens ticks transmit.
‘We recommend that monitoring ticks and pathogens should accompany conservation measures such as woodland regeneration and urban greening projects.
‘This will allow appropriate guidelines and mitigation strategies to be developed, while also helping us to better understand the processes leading to higher lyme disease risk.’
Ticks are increasing in number as a result of some types of conservation.