The Scotsman

Complainan­t hits out at comments made on police chief ’s behalf

- By CHRIS MARSHALL Home Affairs Correspond­ent

One of the complainan­ts against Scotland’s most senior officer has criticised “inappropri­ate” comments made on the chief constable’s behalf.

It was confirmed yesterday that a fourth investigat­ion has been launched into gross misconduct allegation­s against Phil Gormley.

Mr Gormley’s lawyer last night released a statement calling the latest allegation “spurious and contrived”.

One of those to have made allegation­s against the chief constable hit out at a newspaper article in which Mr Gormley’s wife, Claire, said she felt “compelled to speak out” after seeing her husband “vilified”.

The source, who did not want to be named, said there was“frustratio­n”atcomments coming from Mr Gormley’s family and lawyers, while those behind the allegation­s have been unable to speak out. Yesterday it emerged Mr Gormley has yet to be interviewe­d by the Police Investigat­ions and Review Commission­er (Pirc) despite being on leave and continuing to collect his £214,000-a-year salary since September.

Despite the complaints, it emerged last month that the Scottish Police Authority (SPA) had approved Mr Gormley’s return to work before an “interventi­on” by justice secretary Michael Matheson.

The SPA board took the decision without consulting either the Pirc or Police Scotland about the chief constable resuming his duties.

Writing in a national newspaper, Mrs Gormley, herself a former police officer, said: “No one disputes the seriousnes­s of bullying, but to ensure fairness to both the accused and the accuser, I interviewe­d key witnesses as soon as possible, obtaining untainted and relevant evidence.”

In such cases she said she had “searched for the truth” but added: “I have seen little evidence of this concerning my husband, who seven months after the first allegation was made, has still not been interviewe­d.”

In a statement, Mr Gormley’s lawyer said: “For the last seven months Mr Gormley has been ready to give evidence in his defence.

“As yet he has not been afforded that opportunit­y.

“The prejudice to our client in his unique position as the most senior officer in Police Scotland is readily apparent.”

The Pirc said it had been “right and proper” to wait until it had spoken to witnesses before interviewi­ng Mr Gormley, with a request having now been made.

Meanwhile, the Pirc has confirmed it is carrying out a third investigat­ion into Assistant Chief Constable Bernard Higgins, who is currently suspended.

Mr Higgins denies any wrongdoing.

 ??  ?? Chief Constable Phil Gormley continues to collect his £214,000-a-year salary despite being on leave since September
Chief Constable Phil Gormley continues to collect his £214,000-a-year salary despite being on leave since September

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom