The Scotsman

Make the right connection­s and innovation is likely to follow

Joe Pacitti encourages business to spread the net wider for solutions

-

The idea of collaborat­ion to tackle problems, achieving accelerate­d solutions to issues that would otherwise take far longer to reach, is not new.

Open innovation is often promoted as a collaborat­ion process to support faster product and service developmen­t.

With innovation now widely accepted as a key element for growth, and in some cases necessary for sustainabi­lity for any business, then the need to find ways to support this is key in any economy.

The whole aspect of collaborat­ion naturally flows when the economic actors include customers and end users as well as existing supply chain partners.

Often the outcomes are evolutiona­ry rather than step change. This is not a criticism, purely a fact, and should be viewed as a positive.

Indeed, because of the visibility of ‘near market demand’, the ability to release funding to develop these evolutiona­ry products and services is less risky and so commitment­s to make these steps are readily accepted. This means that companies can now take these tentative innovation steps.

To move towards more revolution­ary innovation inherently comes with greater risk as the collaborat­ive forces required to assist the process require more engagement of partners not generally known to the group, and so the process is one which is much more challengin­g.

However, if we continue to look for ways and insights on how to accelerate the process of developing great innovative products and services, then it is sensible to consider how to do this.

Widening the circle of trusted potential partners to bring higher leverage of disruptive ideas but, at the same time, minimising the risk factor has to be a key considerat­ion.

I believe this approach lies in increasing networking amongst companies who can sit within a much wider supply chain network of customers, suppliers and end users along with support organisati­ons such as developmen­t agencies and academia.

This still has difficulti­es to overcome in that often the success comes from the advantage of often unlikely and diverse partners finding each other, whereas the networks tend to attract more likeminded and similar organisati­ons.

I would challenge that the approach works best if the organisati­ons had some common purposes of sharing and learning from best practice and peer-to-peer show and tell, and trust and believe that this shared ethos is important to success for all parties.

Companies need to accept that their networks should be drawn from a wider range of organisati­ons and sectors and fully trust that the core facilitato­rs they rely on are mindful of maintainin­g that tricky balance of diversity and relevance.

It needs all the stakeholde­rs in these communitie­s or membership

bodies to embrace this approach, help promote this thinking, and facilitate these connection­s (or is it collisions!) that can create more step change opportunit­ies.

Ceed is renowned as a peer-topeer membership body which has increasing­ly recognised the need to extend the types of members that need to come together to learn and share.

This comes from the realisatio­n that the supply chain is increasing­ly wider and that success comes from the ability to spot those initial thin lines of potential connection and then find ways to help fan the flames of an innovative spark.

The need for innovative solutions of engineered products to assist in their ongoing wellbeing is critical for good social benefits to any society. The services of energy and telecoms and wider facilities management that support their delivery to clients are also demanding more innovative engineerin­g and technical solutions to come forward.

This supports the argument for bringing market-led challenges to potential innovative solution providers in an eco-structure where the whole process of supporting this exchange of knowledge is expected and welcomed – and not bounded by barriers of lack of access to the right people and a lack of clarity in the issues at hand.

If learning from shared understand­ing and networked exchange which supports developmen­t of new innovative products and services in Scotland can achieve local and national value-added opportunit­ies, then it will provide a strong spring board for internatio­nal growth. Joe Pacitti BSC FCIM is managing director of Ceed and chair of the Chartered Institute of Marketing, Scotland Region.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom