Latvia is leading the world, while sunny Spain is overcast
AVERAGE annual global house price growth stood at 3.1%in the third quarter of 2010, according to the Knight Frank Global Index.
But there are a number of winners and losers. The strongest world region was Asia-Pacific with average growth of 9.9%, and the weakest was Europe at 0.8%. There is a growing gap between the less debt-afflicted European economies of Austria, France and Finland and their neighbours to the south and west of the continent, with Greece, Spain and Ireland, who are all struggling.
Liam Bailey, head of residential research, Knight Frank, says: “There is a positive story to take from the latest results of the Knight Frank Global House Price Index. For the first time since late 2008 prices are rising in each of our six world regions (Asia-Pacific 9.9%, Middle East 5.1%, North America 4.2%, South America 3.5%, Africa 3.0% and Europe 0.8%).
“At the same time prices are rising in 67% of the 48 countries we have reported on this quarter, on an annual basis.
“Unfortunately these upbeat headlines do not tell the full story. Digging into the data, we can see that there are still considerable issues playing out across the global markets. While a majority of countries are reporting positive annual growth, 56% saw prices fall in Q3 this year.
“There is growing evidence that the global housing market recovery, which began in early 2009 following the desperate conditions in 2007 and 2008, may just be beginning to run out of steam. Nearly 30% of countries which had experienced strengthening conditions in 2010 saw quarterly price growth turn negative in Q3 2010. Led by European markets the list includes: Greece, Iceland, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Slovenia and the UK. Outside of Europe the list also extends to cover: China, Canada, Columbia, Dubai, New Zealand, South Africa and Taiwan.
“The average performance of the European economies has improved but the picture reported for individual European countries varies dramatically, with annual growth ranging from 26.1% in Latvia to -13.9% in Lithuania and -14.8% in Ireland.
“The performance of Latvia’s housing market in recent years has proved extremely volatile. In Q3 2009 Latvia was ranked at the bottom of our Index with house prices having fallen by 70% since the mid-2007 peak. Now Latvia leads our table. Following a combination of tax rises and austerity measures such as budget and wage cuts, industrial production has picked up with GDP reaching 2.7%. in Q3 2010.
“Residential demand has been further boosted by a new Latvian immigration law which came into force on 1 July, relaxing residency rules for foreign investors.
“Parallels have been drawn between Latvia and Ireland – in both cases the recession was borne out of a consumerdriven boom and bust and both governments have imposed strict fiscal tightening measures.
@In addition, neither country has been able to use its exports or devalue its currency to minimise the fallout from its economic turmoil. In Latvia house prices have started to climb again since Q3 2009. House prices in Ireland, by comparison, are still following a downward trend with price falls of 36% recorded to date, with declines of up to 50% recorded in Dublin. However, the latest results show the rate of decline is slowing with prices falling by 1.3% in the third quarter compared to 1.7% in the previous quarter.
“In the US annual price inflation has fallen back to 0.6% compared to 4.2% in Q2 2010; average prices in the US now stand at their mid2003 level.
While the weakening of growth in Q3 is partly due to the end of the government’s tax incentive for first-time buyers, the additional issue of high supply volumes, much of it hidden due to pending foreclosures, is continuing to blight the housing market. “Efforts to cool the Asian housing markets appear to be taking effect with more muted growth.”