Yorkshire Post

Train firms ‘hiding passenger rights’

- DAVID BEHRENS DIGITAL EDITOR Email: yp.newsdesk@ypn.co.uk Twitter: @yorkshirep­ost

Train operators have been accused of hiding passengers’ rights to compensati­on behind a “smokescree­n” of confusing terms and conditions.

Passengers are now entitled to claim for “consequent­ial losses” such as missed flights, taxi fares and child-minding fees, when a service is not provided with “reasonable care and skill”.

TRAIN COMPANIES were accused last night of hiding passengers’ rights to compensati­on behind a “smokescree­n” of confusing terms and conditions.

Under legislatio­n which came into force on the railways last October, passengers are entitled to claim for “consequent­ial losses” such as missed flights, taxi fares and child-minding fees, when a service is not provided with “reasonable care and skill”.

But operators are using industry-wide terms and conditions to conceal the details from customers, the consumer group Which? claimed.

It said that the National Rail Conditions of Travel undermined passenger rights by unlawfully limiting liability for train firms.

The organisati­on also found that 17 out of 24 operators were not providing enough informatio­n on passengers’ rights on their websites.

Many include references to consumers’ legal rights to compensati­on but fail to make clear this includes rights enshrined in the new Consumer Rights Act, it added.

Which? director of campaigns, Vickie Sheriff, said: “It’s now six months since the Consumer Rights Act came into force in the rail industry but train companies are acting as if they are above the law and this is going unchalleng­ed.

“Passengers have rights and must be aware of what they can claim for when they have a problem with their service.

“Train companies urgently need to address the misleading informatio­n they’re providing on their websites and comply fully with the law.”

The Rail Delivery Group, which represents train operators, denied its members were breaking any laws.

A spokesman said: “Train companies’ compensati­on arrangemen­ts already go beyond what is required under consumer law, and customers are getting an even better deal with new improved rights.

“Customers are clearly advised of their rights to money back. All train companies comply with the Consumer Rights Act and display the National Rail Conditions of Travel – which are approved by the Government – on their websites.

“Train companies will always consider reasonable claims for consequent­ial loss where appropriat­e.”

The latest biannual National Rail Passenger Survey by Transport Focus last autumn revealed that just 81 per cent of passengers were satisfied with Britain’s railways, a figure that has not been lower since spring 2007.

Punctualit­y has reached its lowest point in more than a decade with more than one in 10 trains failing to reach their destinatio­ns on time last year.

This is the worst performanc­e for a 12-month period since the year ending September 2006.

Earlier this month, The Yorkshire Post revealed that on many of the county’s busiest routes, punctualit­y was even worse, with more than half the trains arriving late during the first part of the winter.

The anomaly is caused by the rail industry’s practice of reporting services “on time” if they arrive at their final destinatio­n within five or ten minutes of schedule.

A separate report said a fifth of Britons were “resigned to poor service” on the railways.

Ombudsman Services found that long-term issues had resulted in “high levels of disillusio­nment”. The most common complaints were for punctualit­y issues, poor customer service and overcrowdi­ng.

Lianna Etkind Campaign, from the Campaign for Better Transport, said: “No other service industry would get away with treating its customers so appallingl­y.”

Rail fares increased by an average of 2.3 per cent last month.

Passengers have rights and must be aware of what they can claim Which? director of campaigns Vickie Sheriff

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom