Sun ig­nores Wik­iLeaks rev­e­la­tions

Baltimore Sun - - MARYLAND VOICES - Steven Pin­son

Over 1,000 of John Podesta’s emails were re­leased by Wik­iLeaks last week (“Hil­lary Clin­ton pushed for char­ity meet­ing in Morocco that re­lied on for­eign fund­ing, emails show,” Oct. 21). Many ques­tion­able re­la­tion­ships and at­ti­tudes were dis­cov­ered. A well known “jour­nal­ist” was will­ing to help the cam­paign on her show. Or there is the email re­gard­ing Ms. Clin­ton speak­ing about cor­rup­tion be­ing “re­ally dicey ter­ri­tory” be­cause “she is so tainted.” There is the email where Mr. Podesta states, “the Obama forces flooded the cau­cuses with in­el­i­gi­ble vot­ers” in 2008. And of course, there is the ex­ploited Sen. Bernie San­ders be­ing called a “doo­fus.”

The Sun re­ported who was on the list to be the vice pres­i­dent! I guess The Sun felt this to be break­ing news three months af­ter the fact (“Wik­iLeaks emails will poi­son Hil­lary Clin­ton’s pres­i­dency,” Oct. 20).

Also this week, there were sev­eral un­der­cover videos re­leased un­cov­er­ing mas­sive voter fraud in strongly Repub­li­can states by groups as­so­ci­ated with the Demo­cratic Party. It is so de­tailed it could be used as a train­ing tape for voter fraud. It could also be used as a very strong ar­gu­ment for voter ID. It is an ab­so­lutely dis­gust­ing rev­e­la­tion about our cor­rupt elec­tion process and how one per­son one vote is a fan­tasy. What does The Sun re­port? Noth­ing.

The Sun should just change their name to The Demo­cratic Sol. At least it would be re­port­ing the truth for once.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from USA

© PressReader. All rights reserved.