When will The Sun re­scind its Clin­ton en­dorse­ment?

Baltimore Sun - - FROM PAGE ONE - Sharon Day, Wash­ing­ton, D.C. The writer is co-chair of the Repub­li­can Na­tional Com­mit­tee.

It used to be that news­pa­pers, leg­is­la­tors and lead­ers would of­fer wis­dom — and dur­ing elec­tion sea­son they would en­dorse can­di­dates for of­fice — based on the facts. To­day, your pub­li­ca­tion stands in the cat­e­gory of en­dors­ing a can­di­date who is un­fit for of­fice — based on the fact that she is un­der FBI in­ves­ti­ga­tion. And yet, your en­dorse­ment still stands in­tact (“Clin­ton for pres­i­dent,” Sept. 29).

Your news depart­ment has writ­ten about this in­ves­ti­ga­tion and con­tin­ues to cover the pres­i­den­tial elec­tion facts. How is it that your ed­i­to­rial page can stand by its de­ci­sion to en­dorse Hil­lary Clin­ton? It’s time to re­scind your en­dorse­ment.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from USA

© PressReader. All rights reserved.