Boston Herald

‘Sanctuary city’ status could cost Bay State cities millions

- By DAN ATKINSON — dan. atkinson@bostonhera­ld.com

A new federal policy to compel immigratio­n detentions by local cops likely conflicts with a bombshell Supreme Judicial Court decision from earlier this week, Bay State elected officials say — and they plan to push back despite the possibilit­y of losing millions of grant dollars.

The Department of Justice has announced it won’t release certain grants unless cities and states allow federal immigratio­n officials access to their detention facilities, and give 48 hours notice before releasing illegal immigrants who are wanted by federal officials. Boston is set to receive $1 million in DOJ grants this year. The state received $3.4 million in grants last year.

The announceme­nt Tuesday came a day after the Supreme Judicial Court barred local officials from holding illegal immigrants solely on detainers from Immigratio­ns and Customs Enforcemen­t. A “Safe Communitie­s Act” proposal in the Legislatur­e would add more restrictio­ns on local officials’ cooperatio­n with federal ones.

State Sen. Jamie Eldridge (D-Acton), who crafted the Safe Communitie­s Act, said the bill prohibits giving release date informatio­n to federal officials and would be in conflict with Sessions’ new regulation­s — as would the SJC ruling.

“They’re in conflict, but there’s a good chance what the Department of Justice proposed could be ruled unconstitu­tional,” Eldridge said of his bill, which he is “absolutely” continuing to push. “The SJC decision is also probably in conflict with what the Department of Justice is trying to do.”

Suffolk Sheriff Steven Tompkins said he was not sure how the conflict would play out, but said he would likely abide by the state court’s ruling over the federal requiremen­ts.

“I am caught in the middle,” Tompkins said. “If I’m forced to choose a side, I’ll choose the side the courts came down on at this point in time.”

A Department of Justice spokesman had no comment on whether the new regulation­s were in conflict with the SJC decision.

“We are a city that values and respects immigrants, and Boston will keep standing by its immigrant community,” said Nicole Caravella, a spokeswoma­n for Mayor Martin J. Walsh, in a statement. “We will continue to evaluate the actions taken by the Trump administra­tion and their impact on the city of Boston.”

“These new rules would harm public safety two ways: either by ending sanctuary policies that help keep down crime or by withholdin­g funds for public safety,” said Somerville Mayor Joseph A. Curtatone, whose city generally receives between $20,000 to $30,000 in grant funds that could be cut. “We need responsibl­e immigratio­n reform, and this is not it.”

 ??  ??
 ?? Stafffilep­hotosbystu­artcahill, left; johnwilcox, ?? CONFLICTS: Suffolk Sheriff Steven Tompkins, left, says he’s ‘caught in the middle’ on DOJ rulings on so-called ‘sanctuary cities.’ State Sen. Jamie Eldridge, above, says those proposals could be found to be unconstitu­tional.
Stafffilep­hotosbystu­artcahill, left; johnwilcox, CONFLICTS: Suffolk Sheriff Steven Tompkins, left, says he’s ‘caught in the middle’ on DOJ rulings on so-called ‘sanctuary cities.’ State Sen. Jamie Eldridge, above, says those proposals could be found to be unconstitu­tional.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States