Clinton is wholly unqualified
FROM: ARLEY MEADOWS PORT DEPOSIT
I do not make a habit of reading Dana Milbank’s column in the Whig, but for some reason I read it on June 8. It was the usual liberal drivel about how Trump is a terrible candidate. I wonder if Milbank is familiar with the old saw “People who live in glass houses ...”?
The Democrats are on the verge of nominating possibly the most unqualified candidate ever (next to Barack Obama). Hillary Clinton has accomplished little in her life. She was a U.S. senator and Secretary of State, but Milbank cannot name anything positive she accomplished in either position. When she quit as Secretary of State, our foreign policy was in a shambles. It remains so under her successor. Does Milbank consider that an accomplishment?
On top of her incompetence Clinton is also corrupt. She recently made history — as the first nominee to be under two FBI investigations at the time of “nomination.” She has used her positions to make millions of dollars for her family. She decries “income inequality” while wearing $12,500 Armani jackets and giving speeches to New York bankers for quarter-million-dollar speaking fees. The extent of her corruption far exceeds the word limit the Whig has for letters.
When we elect a woman president, I hope we do it because that woman is qualified and not because of who she is married to. Can the Democrats honestly say that Hillary Clinton would be their nominee if her husband were not named Bill?