Leaked cam­paign emails show ‘moder­ate’ side of Clin­ton

Daily Local News (West Chester, PA) - - NEWS - By Lisa Lerer

Hil­lary Clin­ton took nearly ev­ery pre­cau­tion to en­sure vot­ers would never know what she told in­vest­ment bankers, lob­by­ists and cor­po­rate ex­ec­u­tives in dozens of closed-door paid speeches be­fore run­ning for pres­i­dent.

Turns out, the Demo­cratic pres­i­den­tial nom­i­nee had good rea­son to do so.

The pri­vate com­ments strike a tone starkly at odds with the fiery mes­sage she’s pushed through­out her cam­paign, par­tic­u­larly dur­ing the hard-fought Demo­cratic pri­mary. Some of her re­marks give fresh fuel to lib­er­als’ worst fears about Clin­ton, namely that she is a po­lit­i­cal moder­ate, happy to cut back­room deals with cor­po­rate in­ter­ests and curry fa­vor with Wall Street for cam­paign dol­lars.

The Wik­iLeaks or­ga­ni­za­tion on Fri­day posted what it said were thou­sands of emails ob­tained in a hack of the Clin­ton cam­paign chair­man’s per­sonal email ac­count. Among the doc­u­ments posted on­line was an in­ter­nal re­view of the speeches con­ducted by cam­paign aides to sur­vey the po­lit­i­cal dam­age her re­marks could cause if they ever be­came pub­lic.

In what aides cal­cu­lated were the most dam­ag­ing pas­sages, she re­flects on the ne­ces­sity of “un­sa­vory” po­lit­i­cal deal­ing, telling real es­tate in­vestors that “you need both a pub­lic and pri­vate po­si­tion.” To in­vest­ment bankers from Gold­man Sachs and Black­Rock, Clin­ton ad­mits that she’s “kind of far re­moved” from the mid­dle-class up­bring­ing that she fre­quently touts on the cam­paign trail. She tells Xerox CEO Ur­sula Burns that both po­lit­i­cal par­ties should be “sen­si­ble, moder­ate, prag­matic.”

And in speeches to some of the coun­try’s big­gest banks, she high­lighted her long ties to Wall Street, ban­ter­ing with top ex­ec­u­tives and say­ing that she views the fi­nan­cial in­dus­try as a part­ner in govern­ment reg­u­la­tion.

“Part of the prob­lem with the po­lit­i­cal sit­u­a­tion, too, is that there is such a bias against peo­ple who have led suc­cess­ful and/or com­pli­cated lives,” she said, ac­cord­ing to an ex­cerpt from an Oc­to­ber 2013 dis­cus­sion with Gold­man Sachs CEO Lloyd Blank­fein. Clin­ton ap­pears to ques­tion the im­por­tance of the di­vest­ment of as­sets that fi­nan­cial ex­ec­u­tives of­ten un­der­take to avoid the ap­pear­ance of con­flicts of in­ter­est when they en­ter govern­ment ser­vice.

“You know, the di­vest­ment of as­sets, the strip­ping of all kinds of po­si­tions, the sale of stocks. It just be­comes very oner­ous and un­nec­es­sary,” she said.

Clin­ton’s cam­paign has re­fused to con­firm — or deny — the au­then­tic­ity of the thou­sands of emails, sug­gest­ing they were part of a Rus­sian ef­fort to in­flu­ence the out­come of the pres­i­den­tial race. “I’m not happy about be­ing hacked by the Rus­sians in their quest to throw the elec­tion to Don­ald Trump,” cam­paign chair­man John Podesta tweeted. “Don’t have time to fig­ure out which docs are real and which are faked.”

In an ef­fort to keep those speeches pri­vate, strongly worded con­tracts pro­hib­ited unau­tho­rized record­ings, re­porters were banned and, in some cases, blog posts about her re­marks pulled off web­sites. Through­out her cam­paign, she has staunchly re­fused to re­lease tran­scripts, re­sist­ing pres­sure from pri­mary ri­val Bernie San­ders and the me­dia to do so.

The Wik­iLeaks dis­clo­sures should be the kind of “Oc­to­ber sur­prise” that would thrill Clin­ton’s op­po­nents, who’ve spent years at­tack­ing her as un­trust­wor­thy and will­ing to say any­thing for per­sonal gain.

AN­DREW HARNIK—THE AS­SO­CI­ATED PRESS

In this Oct. 5, 2016 photo, Demo­cratic pres­i­den­tial can­di­date Hil­lary Clin­ton speaks at a Women for Hil­lary fundraiser at the Hy­att Re­gency in Wash­ing­ton.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from USA

© PressReader. All rights reserved.