Back healed, ques­tions sur­round Tiger’s head

Daily Local News (West Chester, PA) - - SPORTS - By Doug Fer­gu­son

NASSAU, BA­HAMAS >> Tiger Woods has gone through two back surg­eries since he last played a golf tour­na­ment 15 months ago. He had an­other back surgery that knocked him out of the Mas­ters for the first time in 2014. He had four knee surg­eries be­fore that.

None of that mat­ters to Ernie Els when Woods re­turns to com­pe­ti­tion this week.

Els is more cu­ri­ous about what’s go­ing on in his head.

“The tal­ent’s there. It’s been proven. It doesn’t go away,” Els said. “It’s what you think of your­self. It’s what you think where you are. We look at this great player, but he’s not see­ing the same stuff in his own mind. A lot of us are like that. When you’ve achieved as much as he has ... it’s a shock to the sys­tem not to play as good as you have been. To look at other peo­ple look­ing at you like, ‘Hey, you’re not the same guy,’ that’s hard to take.”

Els, per­haps more than any other player, has a deep golf­ing con­nec­tion with Woods.

He was the player Woods sought out 20 years ago at Royal Lytham & St. Annes when de­cid­ing whether to turn pro. They had so many mean­ing­ful bat­tles, and Woods al­most al­ways got the bet­ter of him. Els was run­ner-up to Woods seven times, the most of any player.

Els de­signed the Al­bany golf course where Woods comes back from the long­est lay­off of his ca­reer. He plans to be in the Ba­hamas, and he is as ea­ger as any­one else to see how a guy who won 79 times on the PGA Tour, in­clud­ing 14 ma­jors, stacks up against a gen­er­a­tion that grew up in awe of how Woods played golf.

The Hero World Chal­lenge is a hol­i­day tour­na­ment with an 18-man field and no cut. Even so, it com­mands as much at­ten­tion as any tour­na­ment this year. Woods has been a star at­trac­tion his en­tire ca­reer, and the ap­petite is even stronger af­ter an ab­sence that dates to Aug. 23, 2015.

“I can’t wait to watch, ei­ther, just to see him play,” Ry­der Cup cap­tain Davis Love III said. “The last time I saw him play, I won. It’s hard to be­lieve it’s been that long. I’ve seen his swing. I’ve seen him on video. He’s sent me clips, and I’ve heard the de­scrip­tion of how he feels. I’m ex­cited to see him play.”

“You’ve got to start some­where,” he added. “And I want to see the start.”

Woods al­ready has had one false start. He signed up to play the Safe­way Open, only to pull out three days later be­cause he said he felt “vul­ner­a­ble.” That fol­lowed a week as as­sis­tant cap­tain at the Ry­der Cup, and cram­ming in prac­tice the week be­fore with re­sults that made him want to wait.

Love won the Wyn­d­ham Cham­pi­onship last year in Au­gust at age 51, and it could eas­ily have served as a model for Woods — a power player no longer in his prime, not among the biggest hit­ters any­more, but with enough ex­pe­ri­ence and tal­ent to find a way to score and to win.

“It has to mo­ti­vate him that Vi­jay Singh is last­ing un­til 53, that Ernie is still com­pet­i­tive, that Davis is still com­pet­i­tive,” Love said. “He knows Jack Nick­laus won the Mas­ters in 1986 play­ing part-time. He knows what ev­ery­body has done. I know he’s work­ing hard not to come back and be av­er­age. He wants to come back and win again.”

That might be ex­pect­ing too much, way too soon.

Woods hasn’t won a tour­na­ment since his seven-shot vic­tory in the Bridge­stone In­vi­ta­tional in 2013, the year he won five times and was PGA Tour player of the year. He hasn’t had a se­ri­ous chance at win­ning since his tour­na­ment three years ago when it was at Sher­wood Coun­try Club. Zach John­son holed a wedge from the drop zone to force a play­off, and won when Woods missed a 5-foot putt in the play­off.

No other player has ever faced so much scrutiny, es­pe­cially now.

“I won’t be able to turn the TV on, or the ra­dio on, or look at my phone with­out know­ing what he shot,” Jim Furyk said. “The ex­pec­ta­tions are so high . ... Ev­ery pitch shot, ev­ery putt, ev­ery 3-footer, it’s not un­der pub­lic scrutiny like he has. I guess you live by the sword, die by the sword. That’s why he’s Tiger Woods. It’s a tough sit­u­a­tion.”

Woods said his health had noth­ing to do with pulling out of the Safe­way Open, and Els be­lieves him. He says Woods is in bet­ter shape than some play­ers in their 20s. Then again, he has ac­cu­mu­lated plenty of emo­tional bag­gage over the last sev­eral years, on and off the golf course.

“The phys­i­cal side is not an is­sue. It’s the other side that’s an is­sue, what­ever is block­ing him,” Els said. “But you’ve got to get on the horse. You can’t be stand­ing on the side­lines. You’ve got to get out there . ... Hope­fully, he plays well, re­ally, for his own good­ness, his own sake, his own men­tal sake. If he plays well, it would be great. He’ll have hope and start a good sched­ule. If it goes the other way, he’s be­hind the 8-ball again.”

Com­pen­sa­tion for the loss of free agents has been an is­sue since the free-agent era be­gan in 1976. The sta­tis­ti­cal rank­ing sys­tem es­tab­lished in the 1981 strike set­tle­ment was scrapped in the cur­rent agreement that be­gan with the 2012-13 off­sea­son and re­placed by qual­i­fy­ing of­fers: A team would be en­ti­tled to draft-pick com­pen­sa­tion if a player left as a free agent af­ter fail­ing to ac­cept a one-year con­tract for the av­er­age salary among the 125 high­est­paid play­ers ($17.2 mil­lion this year) and the sign­ing club would lose a top pick. Five of 64 free agents who re­ceived qual­i­fy­ing of­fers ac­cepted dur­ing the cur­rent agreement, and some less-than-premier free agents who re­ceived of­fers said their mar­ket was limited by teams not want­ing to give up draft se­lec­tions.

IN­TER­NA­TIONAL AM­A­TEUR DRAFT

Com­mis­sioner Rob Man­fred has said re­straints on con­tracts for in­ter­na­tional am­a­teur play­ers have not been as ef­fec­tive as man­age­ment had

One of the last items in the ne­go­ti­a­tions will be the lux­ury tax. The thresh­old for the tax has been $189 mil­lion for the past three years, and for the past four years, the rate has been 17.5 per­cent for the first time over the thresh­old, in­creas­ing to 30 per­cent for the sec­ond time in a row, 40 per­cent for the third and 50 per­cent for the fourth or sub­se­quent. An in­crease to $200 mil­lion or more is likely, which should lead to greater spending by high­rev­enue teams cur­rently at or above the thresh­old. The union and some teams would like the rate to re­set for all teams in 2017.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from USA

© PressReader. All rights reserved.