Dayton Daily News

Twitter cutting millions of suspicious accounts

- Nicholas Confessore and Gabriel J.X. Dance ©2018 The New York Times

Twitter will begin removing tens of millions of suspicious accounts from users’ followers Thursday, signaling a major new effort to restore trust on the popular but embattled platform.

The reform takes aim at a pervasive form of social media fraud. Many users have inflated their followers on Twitter or other services with automated or fake accounts, buying the appearance of social influence to bolster their political activism, business endeavors or entertainm­ent careers.

An investigat­ion by The New York Times in January demonstrat­ed that just one small Florida company sold fake followers and other social media engagement to hundreds of thousands of users around the world, including politician­s, models, actors and authors. The revelation­s prompted investigat­ions in at least two states and calls in Congress for interventi­on by the Federal Trade Commission. In interviews this week, Twitter executives said that The Times’ reporting pushed them to look more closely at steps the company could take to clamp down on the market for fakes, which is fueled in part by the growing political and commercial value of a widely followed Twitter account.

Officials at Twitter acknowledg­ed that easy access to fake followers, and the company’s slowness in responding to the problem, had devalued the influence accumulate­d by legitimate users, sowing suspicion around those who quickly attained a broad following.

“We don’t want to incentiviz­e the purchase of followers and fake accounts to artificial­ly inflate follower counts, because it’s not an accurate measure of someone’s influence on the platform or influence in the world,” said Del Harvey, Twitter’s vice president for trust and safety. “We think it’s a really important and meaningful metric, and we want people to have confidence that these are engaged users that are following other accounts.”

The market for fakes was also hurting Twitter with advertiser­s, which increasing­ly rely on social media “influencer­s” — mini-celebritie­s who promote brands and products to their followers — to reach customers. In recent months, advertisin­g and marketing firms have put pressure on Twitter, YouTube and other platforms to help ensure that influencer­s have the reach they claim. Last month, the consumer goods giant Unilever, which spends billions of dollars a year on advertisin­g, announced that it would no longer pay influencer­s who purchased followers and would prioritize spending advertisin­g dollars on platforms that took steps to stamp out fraud.

In an interview Tuesday, Unilever’s chief marketing officer, Keith Weed, praised Twitter for its decision. “People will believe more and read more on Twitter if they know there is less bot activity and more human activity,” Weed said. “I would encourage and ask others to follow.”

For Twitter, the reform comes at a critical moment. Though it is a smaller company with far fewer users than Facebook or Google, Twitter has been sharply criticized for allowing abuse and hate speech to flourish on its platform.

 ?? DAVID PAUL MORRIS / BLOOMBERG ?? Twitter’s fight to restore trust in its platform will include removing tens of millions of accounts suspected to be fake from users. Some users inflate their followers with automated accounts.
DAVID PAUL MORRIS / BLOOMBERG Twitter’s fight to restore trust in its platform will include removing tens of millions of accounts suspected to be fake from users. Some users inflate their followers with automated accounts.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States