Larry Klay­man ‘to­tally’ thinks Hil­lary Clin­ton is a les­bian

GA Voice - - Outspoken -

By D’ANNE WITKOWSKI

Hey, have you heard the one about Hil­lary Clin­ton? Yeah, she’s a les­bian.

I know what you’re think­ing: That joke was poorly con­structed and ex­e­cuted and was not funny at all. And you’re right! Be­cause it is NOT A JOKE.

But don’t take my word for it. Just ask Larry Klay­man, who made a name for him­self rep­re­sent­ing women who claimed to have had af­fairs with Bill Clin­ton. He lays it all out in an in­sight­ful piece posted to World Net Daily ti­tled, “Hil­lary’s Big­gest Lie?”

Be­fore you dis­miss Klay­man as an anti­gay bigot, know that he means no ill will!

“Let me make one thing clear,” he be­gins. “I to­tally re­spect a per­son’s right to live his or her life as he or she may choose, so long as no one is hurt as a re­sult. And, that goes for some­one’s sex­ual pref­er­ence, even though ho­mo­sex­u­al­ity is not en­dorsed in the Bible, and it is not my ‘cup of tea.’”

See? He’s “to­tally” a re­spect­ful guy even if he doesn’t like “tea.” He says that gays and les­bians “are gen­er­ally very nice and kind, and they have a right to be treated equally, not dis­crim­i­nated against. They should be frankly left alone to be what they want to be. That’s called ‘free­dom.’”

So far Klay­man’s look­ing pretty fly for a right guy. Since he’s be­ing so “nice” I can “to­tally” trust him and can’t wait to hear what he has to say.

“In to­day’s world, it is no longer a so­cial stigma to be gay or les­bian, and as a re­sult the Supreme Court has even ruled that they con­sti­tu­tion­ally are to be ac­corded the right to marry each other,” he con­tin­ues. “As a re­sult, I have much less re­spect for those gays and les­bians who con­tinue to live in the closet and hide their life­style.”

Ah, I see. Ap­par­ently Klay­man used to have some level of “re­spect” for closet cases, but now he doesn’t be­cause the Gay Good Life is le­gal and dis­crim­i­na­tion is a thing of the past. Thank you, Mr. Klay­man!

But wait, there’s more: “Case in point, one Hil­lary Rod­ham Clin­ton, who has ap­par­ently lied about her sex­ual pref­er­ence for decades to help pave the way for her pres­i­den­tial can­di­dacy.”

The rest of his col­umn is full of re­hashed ru­mors and ac­cu­sa­tions that have been fol­low­ing Clin­ton for years (and yet some­how, af­ter decades in the pub­lic eye, there ex­ists no ev­i­dence that she is a les­bian. So I guess she’s a ninja les­bian).

Klay­man then writes, “[G]ays, les­bians and trans­gen­ders have to won­der why Hil­lary would call Repub­li­can pres­i­den­tial can­di­date Don­ald Trump a ‘racist’ against peo­ple of an al­ter­na­tive life­style, and then con­tinue to lie about her own sex­u­al­ity.”

I’m not to­tally sure what he means here, but ap­par­ently he thinks that black and brown peo­ple are “of an al­ter­na­tive life­style,” which makes sense since he’s white. And he ap­par­ently also thinks that LGBT peo­ple are go­ing to buy his con­cern that Clin­ton isn’t a true cham­pion of their rights since she’s “ashamed” to be one of them.

WND readers, how­ever, bought it hook, line, and sinker. The com­ments sec­tion is awash with peo­ple who think that Klay­man is drink­ing the left’s Kool-Aid to dare say “nice” things about LGBT peo­ple. They ap­par­ently be­lieve him sin­cere. I, how­ever, do not.

There are also many claims in the com­ment pit that Pres­i­dent Obama is gay and that Michelle Obama is a “tranny.” It’s no won­der that WND readers have no prob­lem be­liev­ing Hil­lary Clin­ton is a les­bian. They just think that Klay­man should have been “meaner” about it. Klay­man and these de­plorables truly de­serve each other.

Larry Klay­man

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from USA

© PressReader. All rights reserved.