Houston Chronicle

Trump seeks $1.5 trillion infrastruc­ture plan

President’s proposal would rely heavily on state, local funding

- By Jonathan Lemire and Martin Crutsinger

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump on Monday will unveil his long-awaited infrastruc­ture plan, a $1.5 trillion proposal that fulfills a number of campaign goals, but relies heavily on state and local government­s to produce much of the funding.

The administra­tion’s plan is centered on using $200 billion in federal money to leverage local and state tax dollars to fix America’s infrastruc­ture, such as roads, highways, ports and airports.

“Every federal dollar should be leveraged by partnering with state and local government­s and — where appropriat­e — tapping into private sector investment to permanentl­y fix the infrastruc­ture deficit,” Trump said at his State of the Union address.

Trump has repeatedly blamed the “crumbling” state of the nation’s roads and highways for preventing the American economy from reaching its full potential. Many in Washington believe that Trump should have begun his term a year ago with an infrastruc­ture push, one that could have garnered bipartisan support or, at minimum, placed Democrats in a bind for opposing a popular political measure.

But the administra­tion chose to begin with health care and relations with Democrats have only grown more strained during a turbulent, contentiou­s year. The White House, now grappling with the fallout from the departure of a senior aide after spousal abuse allegation­s, may not have an easy time navigating a massive infrastruc­ture plan through a polarized Congress. It just grappled with two federal government shutdowns and will soon turns its attention to immigratio­n.

Administra­tion officials previewing the plan said it would feature two key components: an injection of funding for new investment­s and help speed up repairs of roads and airports, as well as a streamline­d permitting process that would truncate the wait time to get projects underway. Officials said the $200 billion in federal support would come from cuts to existing programs.

Half the money would go to grants for transporta­tion, water, flood control, cleanup at some of the country’s most polluted sites and other projects.

States, local government­s and other project sponsors could use the grants — which administra­tion officials view as incentives — for no more than 20 percent of the cost. Transit agencies generally count on the federal government for half the cost of major constructi­on projects, and federal dollars can make up as much as 80 percent of some highway projects.

About $50 billion, would go toward rural projects — transporta­tion, broadband, water, waste, power, flood management and ports. That is intended to address criticism from some Republican senators that the administra­tion’s initial emphasis on public-private partnershi­ps would do little to help rural, GOP-leaning states

Early reaction to the proposal was divided.

Jay Timmons, president of the National Associatio­n of Manufactur­ers, saluted Trump “for providing the leadership we have desperatel­y needed to reclaim our rightful place as global leader on true 21st-century infrastruc­ture.”

“When ports are clogged, trucks are delayed, power is down, water is shut off, or the internet has a lapse, modern manufactur­ers’ ability to compete is threatened and jobs are put at risk,” said Timmons. “There is no excuse for inaction, and manufactur­ers are committed to ensuring that America seizes this opportunit­y.”

But a number of Democrats and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce have pushed the administra­tion to commit far more federal dollars, funded by tax increases, or by closing tax loopholes. And environmen­tal groups expressed worry about its impact.

“President Trump’s infrastruc­ture proposal is a disaster,” said Shelley Poticha, of the Natural Resources Defense Council. “It fails to offer the investment needed to bring our country into the 21st century. Even worse, his plan includes an unacceptab­le corporate giveaway by truncating environmen­tal reviews.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States