Las Vegas Review-Journal

Telemedici­ne’s challenge: Getting patients to click the app Border talks hit ICE wall

Money, curb on agency create rift as deadline looms

- By Jonathan Lemire and Alan Fram The Associated Press

WASHINGTON — Bargainers clashed Sunday over whether to limit the number of migrants authoritie­s can detain, tossing a new hurdle before negotiator­s hoping to strike a border security compromise for Congress to pass this coming week. The White House wouldn’t rule out a renewed partial government shutdown if an agreement isn’t reached.

With a Friday deadline approachin­g, the sides remained separated by hundreds of millions of dollars over how much to spend to construct President Donald Trump’s promised border wall. But rising to the fore was a related dispute over curbing Customs and Immigratio­n Enforcemen­t, or ICE, the federal agency that Republican­s see as an emblem of tough immigratio­n policies and Democrats accuse of often going too far.

Acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney, in appearance­s on NBC’S “Meet the Press” and “Fox News Sunday,” said “you absolutely cannot” eliminate the possibilit­y of another shutdown if a deal is not reached over the wall and other border matters. The White House had asked for $5.7 billion, a figure rejected by the Democratic-controlled House of Representa­tives, and the mood among bargainers has soured, according to people familiar with the negotiatio­ns not authorized to speak publicly about private talks.

“You cannot take a shutdown off the table, and you cannot take $5.7 (billion) off the table,” Mulvaney told NBC, “but if you end up someplace in the middle, yeah, then what you probably see is the

president say, ‘Yeah, OK, and I’ll go find the money someplace else.’ ”

A congressio­nal deal seemed to stall even after Mulvaney convened a bipartisan group of lawmakers at Camp David, the presidenti­al retreat in northern Maryland. While the two sides seemed close to clinching a deal late last week, significan­t gaps remain and momentum appears to have slowed. Both sides are eager to resolve the long-running battle and avert a fresh closure of dozens of federal agencies that would begin next weekend if Congress doesn’t act by Friday.

“I’m not confident we’re going to get there,” Sen. Richard Shelby, R-ala., said on “Fox News Sunday.”

Sen. Jon Tester, D-mont., who appeared on the same program,

agreed: “We are not to the point where we can announce a deal.”

But Mulvaney did signal that the White House would prefer not to have a repeat of the last shutdown, which stretched more than a month, left more than 800,000 government workers without paychecks.

This time, Mulvaney signaled that the White House may be willing to take whatever congressio­nal money comes — even if less than Trump’s goal — and then supplement that with other government funds.

“The president is going to build the wall. That’s our attitude at this point,” Mulvaney said on Fox.

The fight over ICE detentions goes to the core of each party’s view on immigratio­n.

Republican­s favor tough enforcemen­t of immigratio­n laws and have little interest in easing them if Democrats refuse to fund the Mexican border wall. Democrats despise the proposed wall and, in return

for border security funds, want to curb what they see as unnecessar­ily harsh enforcemen­t by ICE.

People involved in the talks say Democrats have proposed limiting the number of immigrants here illegally who are caught inside the U.S. — not at the border — that the agency can detain. Republican­s say they don’t want that cap to apply to immigrants caught committing crimes, but Democrats do.

In a series of tweets about the issue, Trump used the dispute to cast Democrats as soft on criminals.

Democrats say they proposed their cap to force ICE to concentrat­e its internal enforcemen­t efforts on dangerous immigrants, not those who lack legal authority to be in the country but are productive and otherwise pose no threat. Democrats have proposed reducing the current number of beds ICE uses to detain immigrants here illegally from 40,520 to 35,520.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Mick Mulvaney
Mick Mulvaney

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States