Re­view spoiled ‘Twi­light’ end­ing

Los Angeles Times - - Calendar -

As a long­time vam­pire en­thu­si­ast, I was greatly amused by the ti­tle and ac­com­pa­ny­ing il­lus­tra­tion of the chil­dren’s book “Fun With ‘Dick and Jane and Vam­pires,’ ” (Sept. 19). The book sounds de­light­ful, and I plan to buy a copy to read with my daugh­ter.

How­ever, as some­one who is nearly fin­ished read­ing “Eclipse,” the third book in the “Twi­light” se­ries and who is greatly look­ing for­ward to read­ing that se­ries’ fi­nal in­stall­ment, “Break­ing Dawn,” I was quite dis­mayed to come to the end of the re­view and find what ap­pears to be a ma­jor spoiler re­gard­ing that book, just ca­su­ally tossed in as a jest!

Why would I pos­si­bly think that I needed to be cau­tious of spoil­ers re­gard­ing the “Twi­light” se­ries in a re­view of an un­re­lated chil­dren’s book?

Alan San­born

Los An­ge­les

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from USA

© PressReader. All rights reserved.