Los Angeles Times

Renting to highest bidder could be discrimina­tory

- By Anky van Deursen Van Deursen is director of Dispute Resolution Programs for Project Sentinel, a Bay Area nonprofit. Send questions to info@ housing. org.

Question: With the rental market in many areas of the country hot right now, I want to be sure I’m maximizing the return on my investment by getting whatever rental amount the market can support. My rental unit is in a non- rentcontro­lled community.

To that end, I want to advertise one of my rental properties as “$ 2500/ mo., or best offer.” Just as is done in home sales, I want to make space for a bidding war on my rental property so I can get as much as possible in rental income. Should I be worried about any fair housing liability here? Answer: Although there is no black- and- white answer to this question, having a policy of choosing the tenant willing to pay the most money might present a problem under the fair housing laws.

Although landlords can usually charge as much rent for an apartment as prospectiv­e tenants are willing to pay, they must choose tenants using criteria that are not discrimina­tory.

Fair housing agencies tend to look with a careful eye at three kinds of tenant selection criteria: ( 1) those that are deliberate­ly discrimina­tory, such as renting only to tenants who do not have children; ( 2) those based on subjective considerat­ions, such as renting to someone you just “felt more comfortabl­e with;” and ( 3) those that have the effect of discrimina­ting against members of a protected group, such as families with children.

This third type of case could stem, for instance, from a policy of not renting one- bedroom apartments to more than two people. Such a case depends upon statistica­l analysis of the impact of a policy on groups protected under the law.

Having a rental policy of renting to the tenant who offers to pay the most rent does not deliberate­ly discrimina­te against tenants in a protected group since tenants with less money are not a protected group under the law. Nor is choosing a tenant based on who makes the best offer constitute a subjective selection criteria. Rather it is based on an objective offer to pay a certain amount of rent.

However, because income can be statistica­lly linked with some protected groups, including race, gender and disability, it is possible that a policy of renting to the highest bidder might have the effect of discrimina­ting against one or more of these protected groups. Such a case is heavily dependent upon demographi­c and statistica­l analysis, however, and probably would be difficult to prove.

That aside, however, the tenant willing to pay the most rent is not necessaril­y the best tenant to have.

For more informatio­n, contact a local fair housing or mediation program, or Project Sentinel at ( 888) 324- 7468, or visit www. housing. org.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States