Los Angeles Times

ACLU sues for rightist provocateu­r

D.C. transit system is accused of violating Milo Yiannopoul­os’ freedom to advertise his bestsellin­g book.

- By Matt Pearce matt.pearce@latimes.com Twitter: @mattdpearc­e

The American Civil Liberties Union filed a freespeech lawsuit on behalf of one of the nation’s most prominent right-wing provocateu­rs on Wednesday, arguing that Washington, D.C., transit officials violated Milo Yiannopoul­os’ 1st Amendment rights by removing advertisem­ents for his new book.

Yiannopoul­os, who is British, is not the group’s only client in its lawsuit filed in federal court against the Washington Metropolit­an Area Transit Authority. The ACLU’s lawsuit also objected to the agency’s decision to block ad placements for the animal rights group People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, the abortion provider Carafem and the ACLU itself.

But it’s the left-leaning group’s defense of Yiannopoul­os — a former editor of Breitbart News who has criticized the ACLU in the past — that is likely to raise the most eyebrows.

The ACLU has long filed free-speech cases on behalf of far-right groups and individual­s who are traditiona­lly adversarie­s of the ACLU’s own base of supporters, who have counted on the civil liberties organizati­on to act as a bulwark against the Trump administra­tion in the courts.

But the case marks one of the first times that the ACLU has stepped in to represent a member of Yiannopoul­os’ milieu — the new generation of younger right-wing agitators who have gained national prominence over the last two years through online trolling and public spectacles, claiming the mantle of free-speech advocacy as left-wing opponents accuse them of using hate speech against people of color, immigrants and Muslims.

“This case is a beautiful illustrati­on of the indivisibi­lity of the 1st Amendment,” said Lee Rowland, a staff attorney for the ACLU’s national branch and one of the lawyers behind the lawsuit. “When we give government the power to regulate speakers based on their identity or their perceived level of offense, it reduces speech for all of us.”

Rowland added: “It is important to defend speech we hate, because that means the 1st Amendment tide rises for all of us.”

In statement sent to the Los Angeles Times via text message, Yiannopoul­os said he was “glad that the ACLU has decided to tackle a real civil rights issue” after backing “plenty of bad causes in the past,” though he added that “they are also often in the right.”

“Free speech isn’t about only support speech you agree with, it is about supporting all speech — especially the words of your enemies,” Yiannopoul­os wrote. “Strong opponents keep us honest.”

The ACLU’s lawsuit stems from ad rules instituted by the Washington Metropolit­an Area Transit Authority in 2015 that include bans on some medical advertisem­ents and advertisem­ents “intended to influence members of the public regarding an issue on which there are varying opinions.”

“One of our core allegation­s is that WMATA’s rules are so vague that they could basically decide that any advertisem­ent does or does not pass muster on a totally ad hoc basis,” Rowland said.

Requests to place paid ads for PETA, Carafem and the ACLU “were flat-out rejected by these very mushy rules,” Rowland said.

In June, WMATA’s outside advertisin­g agency initially agreed to place ads for Yiannopoul­os’ new book, “Dangerous,” after reaching a $27,690 deal with his company, Milo Worldwide LLC, the lawsuit said.

But about 10 days into a four-week run, the agency reversed course and took down dozens of advertisem­ents featuring Yiannopoul­os’ face and the book title after rider complaints, offering to pay back Yiannopoul­os’ company, according to the lawsuit. Yiannopoul­os refused, stating, “We consider this to be a violation of our 1st Amendment rights.”

The lawsuit seeks to have the ads reinstated for placement on Washington’s transit system and for the agency’s ad rules to be declared unconstitu­tional.

The agency plans to fight the lawsuit. “WMATA intends to vigorously defend its commercial advertisin­g guidelines, which are reasonable and view-point neutral,” the agency said in a statement.

This is not Yiannopoul­os’ only lawsuit involving his book. He has also sued Simon & Schuster for canceling his book contract in February as he faced public criticism over past comments that appeared to endorse pedophilia. Not typically one to apologize for something he’s said, Yiannopoul­os resigned from Breitbart News and backed away from his remarks.

Yiannopoul­os has since attempted to stage a comeback by self-publishing his book and launching an entertainm­ent company based in Florida. The book has spent four weeks on the New York Times’ combined print & e-book nonfiction bestseller list but has been panned by mainstream critics.

Yiannopoul­os gained national prominence in 2016 and 2017, in part by speaking at college campuses around the U.S. According to several contracts obtained by The Times through public records requests, the speaking engagement­s were unpaid. One of those events planned for UC Berkeley was canceled when left-wing protesters smashed windows and clashed with police in protest of his appearance.

The contracts said Yiannopoul­os was being represente­d by Glittering Steel, a film production company at one time run by former Breitbart News Chairman and current White House senior advisor Stephen K. Bannon, according to White House financial disclosure forms. It was also reportedly co-founded by Republican megadonor Rebekah Mercer.

Yiannopoul­os’ representa­tives had initially sought an interview with The Times in July to promote his new book, but Yiannopoul­os backed out after The Times asked about his relationsh­ip with the Mercer family.

“We don’t comment about investors or potential investors,” he said in a series of text messages in July, accusing the newspaper of attempting to run a “hit job” on him. “I’m sure you can get interviews with lesser figures on the ‘new right.’ They need the attention more than I do.”

He seemed to take exception at being compared with other right-wing media personalit­ies such as Mike Cernovich and Jack Posobiec, who have gained wider attention in recent months, much as Yiannopoul­os had, by often causing consternat­ion for liberals.

“They are political operatives,” Yiannopoul­os wrote. “I am a star. There isn’t a close second to me in what I do.”

 ?? Drew Angerer Getty Images ?? MILO YIANNOPOUL­OS also sued publisher Simon & Schuster this year for killing his book deal. Washington’s transit system bans ads that try to sway views on issues “on which there are varying opinions.”
Drew Angerer Getty Images MILO YIANNOPOUL­OS also sued publisher Simon & Schuster this year for killing his book deal. Washington’s transit system bans ads that try to sway views on issues “on which there are varying opinions.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States