No col­lu­sion be­tween Rus­sia, Trump

Maryland Independent - - Community Forum -

Ac­cus­ing the Trump cam­paign of col­lu­sion with Rus­sia is an un­beat­able stalling tac­tic for the lib­er­als. Why? Ever tr y to prove a neg­a­tive? Prove you are not beat­ing your spouse. There are no doc­tor records or hos­pi­tal records show­ing you did and your spouse has never filed a com­plaint. But does that prove to your de­trac­tors you don’t?

The DNC [Demo­cratic Na­tional Com­mit­tee] web site was proven to have been hacked by up to five out­siders. Rus­sia, it was ru­mored, may have been one of them. Pres­i­dent Trump opined that if Rus­sia had found DNC emails, maybe they could find Hil­lary’s deleted emails. The lib­er­als cited this as proof of Pres­i­dent Trump’s col­lu­sion with Rus­sia.

The lib­er­als know there was no col­lu­sion be­tween the Trump cam­paign and Rus­sia, so they can keep push­ing for an­other in­ves­ti­ga­tion un­til the vot­ers get tired of it. No in­ves­ti­ga­tor can find what doesn’t ex­ist. In the mean­time, the lib­eral me­dia can fill its col­umns with de­scrip­tions of the ef­forts of the in­ves­ti­ga­tors, leav­ing lit­tle or no space to re­port what the gov­ern­ment is ac­tu­ally do­ing. Three years from now they will still be warn­ing of a Trump-Rus­sia at­tempt to steal the elec­tion. Will the vot­ers ac­tu­ally be­lieve there is a dan­ger af­ter four years of search­ing and find­ing noth­ing?

Wouldn’t you rather the gov­ern­ment get back to gov­ern­ing in­stead of in­ves­ti­gat­ing? Is this re­ally the way you want your tax money spent? Fred Mumma, Lusby

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from USA

© PressReader. All rights reserved.