AHRQ report finds quality efforts on hospital-acquired infections not working
Hospitals’ progress slow, reports says
Increased awareness and newly spearheaded improvement initiatives have done little to curb the number of healthcare-associated infections, according to a recent quality report from HHS’ Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. AHRQ released its 2009 National Healthcare Quality Report on April 13 alongside a companion report on healthcare disparities, which together “provide a detailed snapshot of how well the healthcare system is doing,” said Carolyn Clancy, the agency’s director. It is the first time that the quality report, now in its seventh year, has contained specific tracking information about hospital-acquired infections, which affect nearly 2 million patients each year, according to HHS.
Using CMS data, AHRQ found an 8% jump in the rate of postoperative sepsis and a 3.6% increase in the rate of postoperative catheterassociated urinary tract infections, signaling a problem that merits immediate attention, Clancy said. They also found no change in the rate of central-line bloodstream infections.
But despite these worrisome figures, it’s important to keep them in context, Clancy said. “The information in that report only applies through 2007, and a lot of it is Medicare data,” she said.
In other words, those numbers don’t take into account the latest efforts by the government and hospitals to make a significant dent in infection rates, HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said in a conference call.
For instance, in late 2009, HHS awarded $17 million to combat hospital-acquired infections. Nearly half that amount went toward a nationwide expansion of the Keystone Project, an 18-month collaborative effort between Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, and the Michigan Health & Hospital Association in Lansing, which lowered the rate of central-line bloodstream infections in more than 100 Michigan intensive-care units using checklists and staff training.
The biggest momentum will likely come from the recently passed Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, which provides incentives to adopt protocols aimed at reducing infections, Sebelius said, and will eventually impose financial disincentives on providers that don’t lower their numbers.
The infection prevention landscape has changed significantly since 2007, agreed Rick Foster, senior vice president for quality and patient safety at the South Carolina Hospital Association. The state’s infection reporting and tracking requirements have helped providers notice patterns and develop strategies, he said, and they have also moved away from the long-held notion that patient safety efforts should be led only by quality improvement staff.
“In our state, we’ve seen hospitals that have made infection prevention the responsibility of the whole unit,” Foster said. “That’s a big transition from the old, siloed approach. Now we have entire intensivecare units that are working together to prevent central-line infections.”
In fact, Foster credits that team-based approach with helping to achieve a nearly 45% drop in the number of central-line bloodstream infections
Joyce: System targets two goals in hopes of making strides.