Ar­ti­cle on Planned Par­ent­hood of­fered bi­ased por­trayal

Modern Healthcare - - COMMENT -

Although I have been a fol­lower of your pub­li­ca­tion for some time, I was dis­turbed by an ar­ti­cle in the Sept. 14 is­sue, “Cuts to Planned Par­ent­hood have trou­bling im­pact on states” (Mod­ern Healthcare, p. 10). This ar­ti­cle was bla­tantly pro-choice bi­ased and painted an in­ac­cu­rate por­trayal of Repub­li­can leg­is­la­tors as the prover­bial wolves in sheep’s cloth­ing out to de­mean mod­ern women back to the Stone Age.

If you want to as­sert your po­lit­i­cal spin, do it through a lob­by­ist, not in a pub­li­ca­tion aimed at ed­u­cat­ing providers with the latest in­for­ma­tion.

Ellen Cantrell Di­rec­tor of ra­di­ol­ogy John Ed Cham­bers Me­mo­rial Hos­pi­tal Danville, Ark.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from USA

© PressReader. All rights reserved.