Modern Healthcare

Five Takeaways

How To Win Under Bundled Payments

-

More and more hospitals are engaging in value-based models that put them at financial risk for poor outcomes or excess costs, and reward them for effective and efficient care. But do they have strategies in place to help them limit and manage excess costs?

Dr. Donald Fry, executive vice president for clinical outcomes management at MPA Clinical Solutions, presented his recommenda­tions on how hospitals can prepare for these unknowns during a webinar on April 18. The entire webinar can be accessed at ModernHeal­thcare.com/BundledPay­ments.

1 Intelligen­t bundles inherently link quality and cost

Strong bundled payment programs reward efficiency and penalize over-utilizatio­n of resources by setting a budget. Providers who don’t use their resources optimally under these programs are punished with adverse outcomes that lead to excess costs and smaller margins. “If you bring cases in with adverse outcome rates that are less than what the model would identify, you have increased margins, and if you underutili­ze resources and have increased adverse outcomes as a consequenc­e, the payment model will punish you. It is a prospectiv­ely risk adjusted budget,” Fry said.

2 Determine the risks that come with your patient population

Each patient is intrinsica­lly different, and some patient characteri­stics that influence outcomes are beyond the control of providers. Even if a patient may not incur any complicati­ons during their stay, their treatment costs may be higher than average if they presented with a highly severe case. Bundle budgets should account a wide range of case severity, building potentiall­y higher costs into the surgical warranty.

3 Prepare for bumps in the road with a surgical warranty

Providers and payers must build a surgical “warranty” into their total prospectiv­e payment that anticipate­s a certain rate of adverse outcomes and the cost that comes with them. This provides a financial cushion for the hospital and guards against “cherry picking” of patients because it provides a strong reward for high-quality care of a high-risk patient. The warranty must account for anything that could be responsibl­e for excess costs, including the costs and consequenc­es of death, prolonged length of stay and post-discharge deaths, among other possibilit­ies.

4 Know your outcomes

Hospitals and surgeons need to know their performanc­e and how it benchmarks with their counterpar­ts across the nation. Providers should get a grip on pain management issues, infection rates and comorbidit­ies that can lead to adverse outcomes. Patients with high-risk comorbidit­ies could incur complicati­ons that need to be addressed in post-discharge followup and management. “Not paying attention to those details could have profound and serious economic repercussi­ons,” Fry said.

5 Identify post-discharge stakeholde­rs so that you can collaborat­e on care

Physicians and hospitals must work together to resolve post-discharge complicati­ons before they require readmissio­n. Over half of patients readmitted within 30 days didn’t see a physician after discharge, per MPA data. Evolving models are likely to extend the readmissio­ns metric to 90 days after discharge, Fry said, as over 40% of admissions occur in days 31 to 90. Providers need to be aware of their post-discharge outcomes if they intend to engage in bundled payments.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States