New York Post

SNAKES ON A PLANE

Bill’s shady meeting taints probe

- Charles Gasparino Charles Gasparino is a Fox Business senior correspond­ent.

Bill Clinton’s secret, half-hour meeting with Attorney General Loretta Lynch had everyone calling foul—with critics suspecting that the f ix is already in for Hillary Clinton, even before she is interviewe­d by the FBI.

IT’S common knowledge in lawenforce­ment circles that, while FBI staffers believe Hillary Clinton should face some charges over her handling of classified government informatio­n through her private e-mail server, political types at the Justice Department would (for obvious political reasons) love to quash any talk of an indictment.

But thanks to Attorney General Loretta Lynch, the quashing of the case against the former secretary of state just got more difficult, legal officials tell me — no matter how an indictment might derail Clinton’s plans to become the next president of the United States.

At issue, of course, is the revelation that Lynch, the country’s chief prosecutor, had the audacity to have a private meeting with ex-President Bill Clinton — the spouse of the target of the e-mail investigat­ion.

Yes, Lynch went to great lengths to say the meeting was innocent, just a chat about their grandkids and golf. And on Friday, she said she’ll accept the recommenda­tion of career Justice staffers — not the political types who want Hillary to win what they view as a third Obama term in the White House.

But that doesn’t even begin to address either the politics or the legal propriety of what just went down, law-enforcemen­t sources tell me.

Indeed, because this friendly “chat” looks so bad, and her meeting may, in fact, amount to witness tampering, Lynch may now be in a box, these sources tell me: She may have no choice but to accept what some have termed a very possible FBI recommenda­tion to charge the former first lady with a crime over mishandlin­g classified informatio­n.

First, Bill Clinton may not be an in- nocent bystander: He hasn’t been charged in the e-mail probe nor is it clear he’s directly under scrutiny, but as I’ve reported in The Post, FBI staffers are probing not just his wife’s use of a private server for top-secret informatio­n, but also possible shenanigan­s involving the Clinton Foundation, the nonprofit she runs with her husband.

One avenue of possible inquiry: whether the secretary of state may have stepped over the legal line by comminglin­g her official State Department business with her role at the charity.

Already, there have been some interestin­g connection­s between foreign government­s, businesses and some individual­s looking for preferenti­al treatment from Hillary’s State Department and elsewhere in the administra­tion, with some of those entities giving donations to the foundation — which doled out a few bucks to charity but also lined the pockets of the Clintons and their friends.

In other words, that friendly chat between Lynch and Bill Clinton could also be construed as witness tampering, law-enforcemen­t types tell me.

Then there’s the politics of the matter. The rift between the FBI and the political hacks at Justice over the e-mail scandal was real and deep; I’m told it was the main reason the e-mail inquiry has dragged on for so long, with some speculatin­g that the final recommenda­tion might come

after the 2016 presidenti­al election. In fact, many law-enforcemen­t sources I speak to say FBI chief James Comey has already signaled to Lynch privately that his staff believes Clinton stepped over the line with her use of the private server for government business, and has gotten pushback from the DOJ.

But the timing of any announceme­nt has likely gotten a lot faster, law-enforcemen­t sources say.

Comey’s hand has been strengthen­ed immensely in bringing a case before the election, because, as one a former prosecutor puts it, “If Comey’s recommenda­tion to bring a case is rejected, he will resign as a hero. It will look like politics pure and simple, which is why that meeting was so stupid.”

Of course, Comey may decide that Clinton’s wrongdoing isn’t as bad as what got former CIA chief David Petraeus in hot water. But many FBI officials believe he’s more likely to follow the lead of his men, and recommend charges against Hillary — and the political implicatio­ns will, of course, be yuuuge.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States