Exxon fined $2 million over sanctions
Oil giant sues U.S., disputes finding of ‘reckless disregard’ on Tillerson’s watch
WASHINGTON — Exxon Mobil Corp. must pay a $2 million fine for showing “reckless disregard” for U.S. sanctions on Russia while Secretary of
State Rex Tillerson was the oil giant’s chief executive officer, the Treasury Department said Thursday.
Exxon in turn sued the
U.S. government to stop the fine.
Treasury said Exxon violated sanctions when it signed contracts in May 2014 with Russian oil magnate Igor Sechin, chairman of government-owned energy giant Rosneft. The U.S. blacklisted Sechin, Tillerson’s longtime business associate, as part of its response to Moscow’s actions in Ukraine and annexation of Crimea.
The same month that Exxon signed the deals, Tillerson said the company generally opposes sanctions and finds them “ineffective.”
Exxon maintained it had done nothing wrong. Hours after the fine was announced, the Texas company sued Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin and the government, saying the U.S. had clearly told companies that doing business with Rosneft was allowed — just not with Sechin himself.
As America’s top diplomat, Tillerson has insisted the sanctions will stay in place until Russia reverses course in Ukraine and gives back Crimea. Still, the sanctions breach occurred on his watch, and now he is responsible for enforcing the sanctions and persuading European countries to also continue doing so.
The Treasury Department said Exxon’s “senior-most executives” knew Sechin was blacklisted when two of its subsidiaries signed deals with him. The Office of Foreign Assets Control said Exxon caused “significant harm” to the sanctions program.
The dispute between Exxon and the government centers on whether the sanctions differentiated between “professional” and “personal” interactions with Sechin, who had been blacklisted only weeks earlier.
Exxon, in its lawsuit, noted that former President Barack Obama’s administration had said the sanctions strategy was to target individuals like Sechin who were contributing to the Ukraine crisis, not the companies they might manage on Russia’s behalf. The company pointed out that a Treasury Department spokesman had even said it would be permissible for an American chief executive officer to attend a Rosneft board meeting with Sechin as long as it wasn’t related to Sechin’s “personal business.” Rosneft itself was not subject to sanctions at the time.
“OFAC seeks to retroactively enforce a new interpretation of an executive order that is inconsistent with the explicit and unambiguous guidance from the White House and Treasury,” Exxon said in the lawsuit, using an acronym to refer to the Office of Foreign Assets Control.
Not so, said the Treasury Department, arguing that the government never gave Exxon or anyone else reason to believe there was an exception for professional dealings. The government noted that its website at the time explicitly warned companies not to enter any contracts signed by people on the blacklist.
The U.S. said the presidents of two of Exxon’s subsidiaries and Sechin had signed eight legal documents in May 2014. That same month, Neil Duffin, president of subsidiary Exxon Mobil Development, signed several deals to continue their work on the Sakhalin oil and natural gas project on Russia’s eastern coast.
A photo posted on Rosneft’s website shows Sechin and Duffin smiling broadly and shaking hands at a conference table with documents and a pen in front of them. A few days later, Tillerson was unambiguous about Exxon’s opposition to the sanctions during his company’s annual meeting.
“We do not support sanctions, generally, because we don’t find them to be effective unless they are very well implemented comprehensibly and that’s a very hard thing to do,” Tillerson said.
Tillerson had played a central role over the years in developing that multibillion-dollar deal. Tillerson knew both Sechin and Russian President Vladimir Putin for more than a decade before he became secretary of state.
The Treasury Department called the violation an “egregious case” and noted that Exxon “is a sophisticated and experienced oil and gas company that has global operations” and should know better when it comes to U.S. sanctions. It leveled the statutory maximum civil penalty of $2 million for the breaches. Exxon’s suit asks the court to set aside the fine.
After the Ukraine-related sanctions put in place under Obama, Tillerson saw Exxon’s stake in a lucrative offshore drilling project with Rosneft come under threat. Tillerson visited the White House numerous times as CEO in the immediate aftermath of the sanctions being announced, but they remained in place.
Concerns about Tillerson’s potential conflict of interest dominated his confirmation hearings in January, and the secretary has recused himself from matters dealing with his former company. The State Department said it wasn’t involved in the decision to punish Exxon for violating the sanctions.
“The secretary continues to abide by his ethical commitments, including that recusal from Exxon-related commitments,” said State Department spokesman Heather Nauert.
As a diplomat, Tillerson has struck a different tone on sanctions and sought to maintain pressure on Russia to stop interfering in eastern Ukraine.
“The U.S. and EU sanctions on Russia will remain in place until Moscow reverses the actions that triggered these particular sanctions,” Tillerson said earlier this month during a visit to Ukraine.