Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Have gun, will teach?

Panel suggests districts have option to arm some educators, staff

- Brenda Blagg Brenda Blagg is a freelance columnist and longtime journalist in Northwest Arkansas. Email her at brendajbla­gg@gmail.com.

Get ready for another debate over guns in Arkansas schools.

A state commission this week endorsed recommenda­tions to allow school districts to arm some employees as a means to improve public school safety.

It isn’t a new idea. The state Legislatur­e has already authorized specially trained employees of Arkansas schools to have firearms on their respective campuses.

Local school boards decide whether to set up a program in their districts and a state board must license the individual­s who volunteer to participat­e. They may be teachers, administra­tors, janitors, bus drivers or other school personnel.

The practice is not widespread. Nor is it particular­ly popular with all teachers and school administra­tors around the state.

Allowing school personnel to be “commission­ed school security officers” was how Arkansas lawmakers answered school safety concerns in the wake of earlier school shootings around the nation, including that shocking slaughter of Sandy Hook kindergart­ners and first-graders in Connecticu­t in 2012.

By 2013, Arkansas school districts, or some of them, were talking about arming volunteer employees. Clarksvill­e did and was described this week as a model for how to have more guns at the ready in case an armed intruder shows up at school.

The mention came as the Arkansas School Safety Commission accepted the recommenda­tions of its law enforcemen­t subcommitt­ee.

The subcommitt­ee chairman, Tim Helder, who is the Washington County sheriff, on Monday called for “a paradigm shift, where we recognize and acknowledg­e the vulnerabil­ity of schools in today’s society.”

Actually, acknowledg­ing that vulnerabil­ity is why the commission exists, why these 18 gubernator­ial appointees are trying to come up with ways to make Arkansas schools safer, to “harden” them, as is so often said.

It is part of Arkansas’ response to the threat of school shootings like the more recent attack in Parkland, Fla., in February.

Sadly, there have been too many such incidents, including more since Parkland saw 17 people, students and teachers, killed by a young gunman.

Parkland, with its student- led protests, refocused attention on the far- too- familiar problem. Students there and elsewhere are demanding greater gun regulation and are trying to get Americans to register and vote to get it, but their activism also triggered parallel nationwide efforts to make schools safer.

Creation of the Arkansas School Safety Commission was a direct response.

Gov. Asa Hutchinson named people from law enforcemen­t and education as well as mental health profession­als to the task force in March. He expects preliminar­y recommenda­tions by July 1 and a final report in November.

The law enforcemen­t piece of the study is critical, of course.

As Sheriff Helder said, there is a difference between feeling safe and being safe in schools.

“It has become apparent that a rapid armed response, from within the school building, saves lives,” he said. “The faster a school shooter is engaged by armed responders, the sooner the situation is halted. This directly translates to lives saved.”

Helder acknowledg­ed a preference for leaving that responsibi­lity to school resource officers, who are employed by local police department­s and sheriff’s offices to work in the schools.

“If money were no object and all schools and law enforcemen­t agencies played well together, we would love to have an SRO (school resource officer) on every campus,” Helder said.

Not all schools have access to school resource officers. Smaller police department­s or sheriff’s offices can’t necessaril­y spare their limited personnel for that duty. Even larger agencies, with more schools to protect, can’t police them all.

That’s the real reason this state may try to arm more school employees.

At least the recommenda­tion, as approved this week, is to follow the example set in Clarksvill­e, which has had a program for five years now and goes beyond what state law requires for commission­ed school safety officers.

Apparently, people there have gotten comfortabl­e with the program, which requires participan­ts to undergo psychologi­cal testing and background checks as well as firearms training.

Their weapons are stored in locked safes in the schools but available if the need arises.

The Clarksvill­e superinten­dent, David Hopkins, who has overseen developmen­t of the program, is also on the state commission.

Hopkins had to win local acceptance to implement the program and other school districts will have to do the same, assuming the choice is ultimately left to them.

Nothing is settled yet. Nor will it be until the commission issues its report and the governor acts on it, presumably in his next legislativ­e package.

Expect Arkansas’ lawmakers to be receptive. They were quick enough to authorize concealed carry on public college campuses, even denying the colleges the option of vetoing the policy.

That was also done in the name of school safety, even as those being protected protested the increased presence of guns on campus.

Expect protest, too, from teachers and other public school employees, not to mention parents, who won’t want guns in the hands of anyone in the schools other than law enforcemen­t and, specifical­ly, school resource officers.

Yet, with this threat of school shootings ever looming, the likelihood is that more Arkansas K-12 school employees may eventually be armed.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States