After nearly 10 months
Many accept that things with the U.S. unlikely to improve
of the Trump administration, many of America’s closest allies have concluded a hoped-for “learning curve” they believed would make Trump a reliable partner is not going to happen.
WASHINGTON — After nearly 10 months of the Trump administration, many of America’s closest allies have concluded a hoped-for “learning curve” they believed would make President Donald Trump a reliable partner is not going to happen.
“The idea that he would inform himself, and things would change, that is no longer operative,” said a top diplomat.
Instead, they see an administration in which lines of authority and decisionmaking are unclear, where tweets become policy, and hard-won international accords on trade and climate are discarded. The result has been a special kind of challenge for those whose jobs is to advocate here for their countries and explain the president and his unconventional ways at home.
Senior diplomats and officials from nearly a dozen countries in Europe, Latin America and Asia expressed a remarkable coincidence of views in interviews over the last several weeks. Asked to describe their thoughts about and relations with the president and his team as the end of Trump’s first year approaches, many described a whirlwind journey, beginning with tentative optimism, followed by alarm and finally reaching acceptance the situation is unlikely to improve.
“We have to adjust to this,” said a second diplomat from a different continent.
Their concerns echo those expressed increasingly in public by Republican lawmakers such as Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., who has spoken of administration “chaos,” and on Sunday described the White House under Trump as an “adult day care center” where the president’s behavior must be managed.
Frustrations and fears, building for months, have grown especially intense recently after Trump’s handling of North Korea.
While foreign diplomats are restrained by the very nature of their jobs from speaking out about the policies and politics of their host governments, it is not unusual for them to trade tips and gossip in the early days of a new administration when information is in short supply and it is unclear which top officials have the most sway with the leader of the free world.
But their perplexing dealings with the Trump administration has become an obsession of late for ambassadors.
“It’s always an undercurrent when we get together,” said a third senior diplomat. “We’re always asking each other, ‘who do you deal with’ inside the administration? ‘How do you handle’ difficult situations?”
“When somebody actually sees Trump, people immediately flock around. What did you see? What did he say? Was Ivanka there ... What kind of look was on Kelly’s face?” he said, referring to White House Chief of Staff John Kelly. It is, he said, a kind of Kremlinology.
Others, some of whom had difficulty with the former Obama administration, have found a new closeness with the United States. Saudi Arabia, after enduring Obama’s human rights criticism and policy objections, is now a favored Trump nation.
Afghanistan Ambassador Hamdulah Mohib, whose government had been alarmed by the Obama administration’s unfulfilled plans to withdraw the vast majority of U.S. troops from the country, said he and his government had high-level access to Trump administration officials this summer as the debate over the war heated up.
The majority of those interviewed were far more critical, and said they would speak candidly only on condition of anonymity.
Several spoke of the difficulty of determining where power lies within the administration, and how decisions are made. “We are still not sure how the equilibrium in this administration is playing out in terms of who is responsible for what,” said a senior European. “Is it the White House? The State Department? Is Defense calling the shots? ... I’m being clinically analytical, not chiding. This is the situation. We are guessing, sometimes.”
Things have gotten “a bit better” since Kelly’s arrival last summer, said one Latin American. “At least with process, if not policy. It’s clear (Kelly) has influence. But Jared? McMaster? We don’t know if they’re in or out,” he said, referring to Trump adviser and son-inlaw Jared Kushner and Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster, Trump’s national security adviser.
Many of those interviewed said they are often told by administration officials to ignore Trump’s tweets or undiplomatic remarks. They recognize it is a risky game.
“In the business sector, you can be very forceful in negotiations,” said a diplomat whose government has been on the receiving end of Trump tweets. “You call each other names all day, then you sit down and have a martini. In foreign policy, there are consequences to the name calling. Damage is done.”
Some foreign diplomats have tried to work around the White House by forging closer relationships with the battered and shrinking Democrat and Republican foreign policy establishment in Congress. Another strategy, particularly on issues related to climate change and trade, has been to work directly with governors, several foreign diplomats said.
A diplomat whose country has cordial relations with the administration said his government is exploring more extensive trade and diplomatic ties with Asia.
“At the beginning,” he said, Trump was “a fascination.” As the months have passed, he said, “all this perplexing noise from Washington, it becomes background noise. And the United States is a bit less important than before.”
On the world stage in May: European Council President Donald Tusk, Britain’s Theresa May, President Donald Trump, Germany’s Angela Merkel, Japan’s Shinzo Abe, Canada’s Justin Trudeau, France’s Emmanuel Macron, European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker and Italy’s Paolo Gentiloni.