ASK THE EX­PERT

Packer Plus - - News -

Pack­ers beat writer Ryan Wood of USA TO­DAY NET­WORK Wis­con­sin an­swered ques­tions dur­ing a chat at JSOn­line.com on Mon­day. To read the com­plete tran­script, visit json­line.com/pack­ers.

Q: Of all the play­ers Green Bay drafted, do you see any one of them po­ten­tially be­com­ing a star?

A: This is a good place to start, be­cause it’s what ev­ery­body wants to know, right? Will any of the play­ers the Pack­ers drafted be­come All-Pros in this league. Here’s the prob­lem: there’s zero chance to know that be­fore their first pro­fes­sional foot­ball prac­tice. There’s usu­ally no way to know after their first sea­son. Re­mem­ber, it took 2009 fourth-round pick T.J. Lang eight years for his ca­reer to be stamped as Pro Bowl cal­iber. Of this class, you’d have to look at the first two picks as the best bets. Kevin King (6-3, 4.43) and Josh Jones (6-1, 220, 4.40) have the size-speed at­tributes you usu­ally see on Pro Bowl lists. But they have to play the game. We prob­a­bly won’t know how good any of these play­ers are un­til three years from now.

Q: I thought Biegel was a great col­lege player. I don’t see him as an im­pact player in the NFL. Am I wrong? NFL.com com­pared him to Frank Zombo... yikes

A: He ran an iden­ti­cal 40 (4.67) and has same height (6-3) as Clay Matthews. Now, to say Vince Biegel is the same ath­lete, or even a sim­i­lar ath­lete, as Clay Matthews is wrong. I don’t care much about a pass rusher’s 40. I want to know their 10yard split, which shows their “get-off” the line of scrimmage. Matthews’ was an oth­er­worldly 1.49 10-yard split. Biegel’s 1.64, while cer­tainly not slow, was not in the same neigh­bor­hood as Matthews. What Biegel should bring is some tech­nique with his ath­leti­cism after play­ing four sea­sons at Wis­con­sin. He’s a ma­ture player, turn­ing 24 years old later this year, and will be counted on to fac­tor into their edge rush ro­ta­tion as a rookie.

Q: Ryan, do you think there was a sort of bid­ding war to move up to San Fran’s 2nd pick, lead­ing to the large price the Bears paid for the pick ?

A: Read Peter King’s ter­rific be­hind-thescenes story on the 49ers draft to­day, and he men­tioned an­other pos­si­ble team in con­tention (didn’t re­port who). But it didn’t seem like a real bid­ding war. The 49ers were able to pull that fourth-round pick to seal the deal. If Tru­bisky turns into a fran­chise QB, it was the best move made in the en­tire draft. If not, it was the worst move made in the en­tire draft. Other than that, not much rid­ing on the line for Bears GM Ryan Pace.

Q: Which of our new rb's will make the great­est im­pact in your opin­ion?

A: I think you'd have to start with Ja­maal Wil­liams. Call it what­ever you want — a lead run­ning back, a power run­ner, a workhorse — but the Pack­ers had to find one in this draft. They think Wil­liams' style fits that role, and com­ple­ments Ty Mont­gomery nicely. The Pack­ers would like to main­tain Mont­gomery's ver­sa­til­ity and still move him around some, be­cause he's a matchup prob­lem all over the field. They needed a down­hill, be­tween-thetack­les run­ning back, and they ex­pect Wil­liams to give them that.

Q: Why did Malachi Dupre fall? One of the last guys picked.

A: I don't know the an­swer, but that sur­prised me a lit­tle bit too. Could end up be­ing a nice sev­enth-round pick.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from USA

© PressReader. All rights reserved.