In Pacific, increasing tensions evoke nuclear legacy
Bikini Atoll still contaminated by radiation from tests
WELLINGTON, New Zealand — As a young boy growing up on Bikini Atoll, Alson Kelen spent idyllic days playing on the beach and fishing.
His grandfather built canoes and his father tended the land. With fewer than 150 people on the remote Pacific island it was a close community, he says, with few signs of the former
U. S. nuclear testing program other than the concrete bunkers he was told to avoid and the sunken ships in the lagoon.
But in 1978, when Kelen was 10, officials relocated everybody. It turned out they’d been premature in declaring the Marshall Islands atoll safe again for humans. Radiation levels were still dangerously high.
More than 70 years after the first tests, the atoll remains contaminated today. It’s part of a troubling nuclear legacy that continues to affect islands and people across the Pacific long after the U. S., Britain and France stopped their testing programs there.
As nuclear tensions rise in the Asia- Pacific region, and in the South Pacific in particular, Kelen and others are reflecting on that legacy anew.
North Korea has discussed testing a hydrogen bomb in the Pacific after earlier firing a missile over Japan and threatening Guam. President Donald Trump has threatened to “totally destroy North Korea” if provoked and called leader Kim Jong Un “Rocket Man.” The dictator has responded by calling Trump a “mentally deranged U. S. dotard.”
Kelen says that if the threats do escalate to a nuclear test or even an attack, “it would be a huge, huge disaster.”
The 49- year- old says he has no idea if his exposure to radiation during the four years he lived on Bikini as a boy has affected his health. He says scientists used to test him and his family regularly, but stopped within a couple of years of them leaving the atoll.
Scientists have calculated that about 1.6 percent of all cancers developed by Marshallese people exposed to radiation can be attributed to the nuclear tests. For some islanders who were close to the blasts, the rate rises to 55 percent.
The nuclear tests exacted an enormous social toll on Bikini residents and their children, who are now scattered across the Marshall Islands and beyond and have been left without a homeland. Kelen says they’ve lost the ancestral land that’s central to their identity.
“Ninety percent of Bikinians have never seen Bikini. It’s a legend; it’s a fairy tale,” he said. “They know more about Hawaii and the U. S. mainland than Bikini.”
The U. S. government first asked Bikini residents to leave temporarily in 1946. It then conducted a series of tests over a dozen years, including detonating a massive hydrogen bomb hundreds of times more powerful than the nuclear bombs the U. S. dropped on Japan during World War II.
The inhabitants were moved to other islands that proved inhospitable. Kelen’s family eventually ended up in Majuro, the capital. He says his parents always planned to return to Bikini but got to spend just four years there before being told to leave again. Kelen’s father died two years ago and his mother, now 93, is too old to travel.
“They told us we were relocated from Bikini for the good of mankind, to bring peace to the world. But I think nuclear is the same as climate change,” Kelen said. “It benefits the big countries and ruins the small countries.”
Bikini residents have received some compensation from the United States. But many people, including Marshall Islands President Hilda Heine, say it’s not enough.
Heine said in a speech this year that the removal of the Bikini residents produced “inconsolable grief, terror and righteous anger” that hadn’t diminished in the seven decades since, and had been exacerbated by the U. S. being dishonest about the extent of the radiation and its effects.
A huge mushroom cloud rose above Bikini Atoll in the Marshall Islands after an atomic test blast on July 25, 1946. Nuclear tests by the U.S., Britain and France continue to affect islands and people across the Pacific.