Me­nen­dez jury says it’s dead­locked

Judge tells panel in N.J. bribery trial to keep de­lib­er­at­ing

Richmond Times-Dispatch - - NATION & WORLD -

— The jury in the bribery trial of Demo­cratic U.S. Sen. Bob Me­nen­dez and a wealthy donor and friend told the judge it couldn’t reach a ver­dict Mon­day on any of the 18 counts against them, prompt­ing the judge to order it to re­turn on Tues­day to con­tinue de­lib­er­at­ing.

The de­vel­op­ment capped a tu­mul­tuous day that be­gan with de­fense at­tor­neys ar­gu­ing with U.S. District Judge Wil­liam Walls over a dif­fer­ent is­sue: pub­lic com­ments made last week by a ju­ror who had been ex­cused for a pre­vi­ously sched­uled va­ca­tion.

The ju­ror told re­porters she and oth­ers were in fa­vor of ac­quit­tal but she an­tic­i­pated a hung jury. De­fense at­tor­neys pressed the judge to ques­tion ju­rors, who have been told re­peat­edly not to read re­ports about the case, on whether any had heard the ex­cused ju­ror’s com­ments.

Four ju­rors and three al­ter­nates had, but af­ter ques­tion­ing them in pri­vate the judge di­rected the jury to restart de­lib­er­a­tions with an al­ter­nate re­plac­ing the ex­cused ju­ror.

Three hours later, the ju­rors sent a note say­ing they couldn’t “reach a unan­i­mous ver­dict on any of the charges.” The judge in­structed them to “have a good meal and good sleep” and re­turn Tues­day.

Me­nen­dez seemed buoyed by the ju­rors’ note.

“As I said two and a half years ago when I first faced these charges, I was in­no­cent,” he said. “And clearly there are ju­rors who be­lieve in my in­no­cence.”

A mis­trial would be a ma­jor set­back for the gov­ern­ment, which spent more than two years in­ves­ti­gat­ing the New Jer­sey sen­a­tor’s ties with Florida eye doc­tor Salomon Mel­gen be­fore in­dict­ing them in the spring of 2015. The trial is in its 11th week.

A mis­trial also would rep­re­sent a mixed bag for Me­nen­dez. With the case pend­ing, he wouldn’t face pres­sure to step down as he might in the event of a con­vic­tion; but, con­versely, the charges likely would be hang­ing over him as he seeks re-elec­tion next year, as­sum­ing the gov­ern­ment seeks a re­trial.

De­fense at­tor­neys ar­gued on Mon­day that ex­cused ju­ror Eve­lyn Ar­royo-Maultsby’s com­ments that she was told she couldn’t send the judge a note last week could rep­re­sent a breach of pro­to­col. The judge down­played any no­tion that the jury had been com­pro­mised and ac­cused de­fense at­tor­ney Abbe Low­ell of mak­ing an is­sue of it be­cause “she was on your side.”

Prose­cu­tors al­lege that be­tween 2006 and 2013, Me­nen­dez and Mel­gen en­gaged in a bribery scheme in which Me­nen­dez traded his po­lit­i­cal in­flu­ence for lux­ury va­ca­tions and flights on the doc­tor’s pri­vate plane.

The men each face about a dozen counts in­clud­ing bribery, fraud and con­spir­acy.

Both men deny the al­le­ga­tions. De­fense at­tor­neys have sought to show ju­rors that the two men are long­time friends who ex­changed gifts out of friend­ship.

Me­nen­dez

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from USA

© PressReader. All rights reserved.