Royal Oak Tribune

Say no to Proposal 1

-

Proposal 1 is a very complicate­d Constituti­onal amendment. The confusing ballot language seems to be intentiona­lly designed to elicit a “yes” vote. It doesn’t even hint at its primary result: it will reduce funding to protect Michigan’s forests, wetlands, parks and wildlife habitat.

The Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund was placed into the Constituti­on in order to protect it from diversions and to ensure that its primary purpose remained to protect land. We should not undo those protection­s in order to divert more money into recreation­al developmen­t.

The Trust Fund’s priority should remain to acquire land. That is the best way to benefit Michigan’s residents and wildlife, by providing perpetual benefits for generation­s to come.

The Michigan Land Conservanc­y recommends a “No” vote on Proposal 1. Readers are encouraged to visit www.MichiganPr­oposal1.com for further informatio­n.

Jack Smiley

President Michigan Land Conservanc­y

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States