Brett’s no Beto
Re: “Beto vs. Brett,” by Raymond Franck, Your Turn, Sunday:
Mr. Franck: The case against Brett Kavanaugh was clear and justified; however, the Republicans (plus one Democrat) did not see it that way.
Since when are you judge and jury? Perhaps you need to examine Kavanaugh closer, because I am convinced that he is guilty of the escapades, but as you well know, the FBI did not do a thorough investigation, as it should have, and as a result, it became a very cutthroat decision.
Your comparison to Brett (Bart) with Beto O’Rourke compare two different types of people. For one, Beto is younger than Kavanaugh, and there was no sex assault or drinking excessively to a “blackout” stage like with your preferred person.
What is the credible evidence that you say is part of a criminal record? As I understand it, the DWI case was dismissed (after he went through a diversion program) and Beto has made vast improvements as a citizen and took on the responsibility that goes with it. I think everyone deserves a second chance, but as you can see, Kavanaugh allegedly had alcoholic habits,