San Francisco Chronicle

There’s no ‘good-guy’ visa for any immigrant

- By Susan Gluss Susan Gluss is a Bay Area freelance writer.

Meet Antonio, a loving husband and father of three. A skilled furniture-maker and the sole provider for his family. In his 19 years in California, he’s put down roots, worked hard, and paid his taxes like any U.S. resident. But Antonio is undocument­ed.

Antonio (who doesn’t want to use his last name) came here to raise a family without fear of extortion or violence in his home town near Coyoacán, Mexico. He says it’s worse there now, rife with gangs, corruption and crime. No one is safe, he says; people feel threatened — even by the authoritie­s.

But now Antonio lives in fear here in the U.S. One night in 2013, driving home from work, Antonio pulled over. He’d had a few beers and felt ill. Police spotted him and eventually charged him with reckless driving, lacking evidence for a DUI charge. It was his first and only offense. It was a minor infraction but has changed his life.

The U.S. government has been trying to deport him ever since. He just lost his asylum case before Dana Leigh Marks, an immigratio­n judge in San Francisco. He’s appealing the ruling, but his chances are slim to none.

Much has been reported about the trauma of separating families trying to cross the border into the United States. What’s not so evident — but even more insidious — are stories like Antonio’s. A decent man of good moral character, a devoted father and husband, a valued member of the community suddenly uprooted after nearly two decades here.

To what end? For what purpose?

People have the misconcept­ion that there’s a “good-guy visa,” an Oakland immigratio­n lawyer told me. To the contrary, there’s been a trajectory of hardship in immigratio­n law.

There were far fewer restrictio­ns in times past. In the 1800s, most European immigrants could literally walk off the boat and settle here. In the wake of World War l, the United States started to create immigratio­n quotas and require registrati­on papers. Still, many undocument­ed migrants were allowed to register retroactiv­ely for a time (although Asians faced harsher treatment).

In the past century, restrictio­ns have become more severe — with strict enforcemen­t. In 1965, new quotas were establishe­d for people from Mexico and Central America, among others. But it didn’t stop the migration.

The cruelty of forcing people to live in the shadows was not lost on President Ronald Reagan. In 1968, he signed into law legislatio­n that strengthen­ed border security but also granted amnesty to nearly 3 million immigrants. It was a humane provision, but short-lived.

Just 10 years later, a Republican-controlled Congress passed a draconian bill signed by President Bill Clinton. That Illegal Immigratio­n Reform and Immigrant Responsibi­lity Act expanded grounds for deportatio­n and exclusion. It tightened the law and made it nearly impossible to obtain legal status. Millions of unauthoriz­ed immigrants like Antonio now face random deportatio­ns with no foreseeabl­e path to citizenshi­p.

Antonio faces a Faustian choice: leave his wife and children behind, or move them to Mexico and try to rebuild a life?

“The situation is bad,” Antonio said. “If I go back and open a small business there, it won’t grow because of extortion. I’ll have to pay criminals to do business and be forced to close,” he said.

Antonio’s teenage children are American citizens. If separated from their father, they could suffer emotional and psychologi­cal harm. Antonio’s wife can’t support them alone, but no one wants to move. This is the only home the children have ever known.

Antonio is distraught. He blames himself for the mistakes he made and in a letter to the court begged for forgivenes­s. He never meant to harm his children, he said. His plea was denied. The judge ruled that “any emotional hardship his children may experience from living in a foreign country they have never visited is not beyond what is ordinarily expected.”

If the law is not changed and fast, millions more families in communitie­s across the country will be devastated by forced separation­s.

Immigratio­n defines our nation. America’s founders and many of our forebears emigrated here in search of a better life. It’s a legacy we need to honor and hold dear. If we tear these families apart, we tear apart the soul of our country.

 ?? Tamir Kalifa / New York Times ?? A group of men gather their belongings in Matamoros, Mexico, after being deported from Brownsvill­e, Texas. Our “nation of immigrants” has gotten tougher on immigratio­n for years.
Tamir Kalifa / New York Times A group of men gather their belongings in Matamoros, Mexico, after being deported from Brownsvill­e, Texas. Our “nation of immigrants” has gotten tougher on immigratio­n for years.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States