U.S. pulls out of UNESCO

State Depart­ment cited group’s anti-Is­rael bias.

Star Tribune - - THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - By ELI ROSEN­BERG Wash­ing­ton Post

The United States will with­draw from UNESCO at the end of next year, the State Depart­ment said Thurs­day, in or­der to stop ac­cu­mu­lat­ing un­paid dues and take a stand on what it said is anti-Is­rael bias at the U.N.’s ed­u­ca­tional, sci­ence and cul­tural or­ga­ni­za­tion.

In no­ti­fy­ing UNESCO of the de­ci­sion Thurs­day, the State Depart­ment said it would like to re­main in­volved as a non­mem­ber ob­server state. That will al­low to United States to re­main en­gaged in de­bates and ac­tiv­i­ties, though it will lose its right to vote on is­sues.

The with­drawal of the U.S., which was a found­ing mem­ber of the or­ga­ni­za­tion af­ter World War II, deals a sym­bolic blow. But it does not nec­es­sar­ily fore­shadow a fur­ther re­trench­ment of U.S. en­gage­ment with the United Na­tions, which the Trump ad­min­is­tra­tion has been push­ing to bring about struc­tural and fi­nan­cial re­forms.

“This is prag­matic, not a grander po­lit­i­cal sig­nal,” said John McArthur, a fel­low in the Global Econ­omy and De­vel­op­ment pro­gram at the Brook­ings In­sti­tu­tion and an ad­viser to the U.N. Foun­da­tion. The most im­me­di­ate im­pact is that the U.S. will halt the ar­rears it has run up since it stopped fund­ing the or­ga­ni­za­tion in 2011 to protest ad­mit­ting Pales­tine as a full mem­ber. By the end of this cal­en­dar year, the un­paid U.S. bill will amount to $550 mil­lion. With no sign that U.S. con­cerns would be ad­dressed, Sec­re­tary of State Rex Tiller­son de­cided to pull out af­ter Dec. 31, 2017, when the un­paid bal­ance will top $600 mil­lion.

State Depart­ment of­fi­cials said they hope the with­drawal will help push UNESCO to make changes that would sat­isfy Wash­ing­ton so the U.S. can re­sume full mem­ber­ship.

“It sends a strong mes­sage that we need to see fun­da­men­tal re­form in the or­ga­ni­za­tion, and it raises ev­ery­one’s aware­ness about con­tin­ued anti-Is­rael bias,” said one of­fi­cial, speak­ing on con­di­tion of anonymity.

The United States has been at odds with UNESCO in re­cent years. State Depart­ment of­fi­cials cited a 2012 de­ci­sion not to ex­pel Syria from its hu­man rights com­mit­tee af­ter the civil war in that coun­try be­gan, and re­peated res­o­lu­tions that re­fer to Is­rael as an oc­cu­py­ing power.

Nikki Ha­ley, the U.S. am­bas­sador to the U.N., said the last straw was when UNESCO this sum­mer des­ig­nated the old city of He­bron in the West Bank, with its Tomb of the Pa­tri­archs, a Pales­tinian World Her­itage site.

Call­ing UNESCO’s politi­ciza­tion a “chronic em­bar­rass­ment,” Ha­ley added, “Just as we said in 1984 when Pres­i­dent Rea­gan with­drew from UNESCO, U.S. tax­pay­ers should no longer be on the hook to pay for poli­cies that are hos­tile to our val­ues and make a mock­ery of jus­tice and com­mon sense.”

Is­raeli Prime Min­is­ter Ben­jamin Ne­tanyahu called the de­ci­sion “brave” and “moral.” Ne­tanyahu said he had in­structed the Min­istry of For­eign Af­fairs to pre­pare for Is­rael’s with­drawal as well. “UNESCO has be­come a the­ater of the ab­surd be­cause, in­stead of pre­serv­ing his­tory, it dis­torts it,” he said in a state­ment.

Irina Bokova, di­rec­tor-gen­eral of UNESCO, ex­pressed “pro­found re­gret” over the de­ci­sion.

“At the time when the fight against vi­o­lent ex­trem­ism calls for re­newed in­vest­ment in ed­u­ca­tion, in di­a­logue among cul­tures to pre­vent ha­tred, it is deeply re­gret­table that the United States should with­draw from the United Na­tions agency lead­ing th­ese is­sues,” she said in a state­ment, call­ing it a “loss for mul­ti­lat­er­al­ism.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from USA

© PressReader. All rights reserved.