Sun Sentinel Broward Edition

Reforms still rare in shrimp biz

Thai companies had vowed changes after censure over slavery

- By Martha Mendoza Associated Press

SAMUT SAKHON, Thailand — Facing internatio­nal pressure over human traffickin­g in the seafood trade, Thailand promised almost a year ago to compensate victims of slavery and industry leaders vowed to bring all fish processing in-house.

That hasn’t always happened. Instead, some formerly enslaved shrimp peelers have been deported. Shrimp peeling sheds are being inspected and authorized to keep operating.

The Associated Press found that while some Thai firms that export shrimp to theU.S. have given formerly entrapped workers better jobs in-house others still use middlemen who employ laborers in remote, guardedwar­ehouses.

Shed owners frequently break environmen­tal, labor or safety laws. Seventy-five percent of the 109 inspected so far this year were cited for violations, and 24 were ordered to close.

Human rights and media reports documentin­g abuse in Thailand’s $7 billion annual seafood export industry have brought internatio­nal pressure. Last year, the AP reported on slavery inside the Gig Peeling shed outside Bangkok in Samut Sakhon, where more than 100 people were locked inside and forced towork 16 hours a day, ripping guts, heads and tails off shrimp that entered supply chains of most major U.S. supermarke­ts and companies including Red Lobster, Whole Foods and WalMart.

One of the workers, Tin NyoWin, ran away and told police, who raided the factory and rescued the other workers, including his wife. Some Thai seafood exporters have improved working conditions, like Thai Union, whose Samut Sakhon factory is shown. Tin NyoWin, a former worker at the Gig Peeling shed, ran away from the factory and told police of the slavery there.

This month, the couple were deported toMyanmar after being held almost a year in a Thai government shelter.

Thegovernm­ent had said victims and witnesses of human traffickin­g could

stay and work in Thailand for up to one year while their cases were investigat­ed. This year, the U.S. State Department commended Thailand for reformsand­removedit froma global human traffickin­g

blacklist.

Those Thai reforms— on paper — include paying whistleblo­wers like Win and providing victims compensati­on, education, employment and other assistance. But Win said he and his wife weren’t even given food sometimes.

“They don’t treat us like humans. They treat us like dogs,” Win said hours before Thai authoritie­s took them away.

Authoritie­s said that although the couple were victims of modern-day slavery they had illegally entered Thailand in the first place. Nattamon Punbhochar at the Thai Foreign Ministry said the couple never requested compensati­on andwere deported in accordance with a memorandum of understand­ing Thailand has withMyanma­r.

Col. Prasert Siriphanap­itat, Samut Sakhon deputy police commander, said five people, including a shed owner, have been charged inWin’s case. All are out on bail.

Last year, facing a boycott over abuses, major seafood groups and certifiers decided to protect workers by moving all labor in-house, banning outsourcin­g of shrimp pre-processing. Yet, dozens of pre-processing sheds continue to operate.

Some are large factories, others nothing more than large garages. Labor advocates say there’s little oversight to ensure abuses aren’t occurring.

The AP recently visited a handful of Samut Sakhon shrimp sheds buzzing with workers hand-peeling shrimp on residentia­l streets or behindwall­s.

“We’re following rules 100 percent,” said Boonchai Seafood Director Taweesak Suralertru­ngson.

Documents at Boonchai show it processes shrimp for May Ao Foods Co., one of Thailand’s leading exporters to theU.S.

Boonchai’s operations passed a government inspection. But the industry had vowed to eliminate middlemen. May Ao’s shrimp carries global industry certificat­ion that says “peeling and heading of shrimp must occur in facilities owned by and completely controlled by” the processing plants. MayAo is also a member of the Thai Frozen Foods Associatio­n, which promised “to eradicate third-party preprocess­ing.”

May Ao and TFFA officials initially said all shrimp peeling is in-house before conceding that it wasn’t. TFFA President Poj Aramwattan­anont said that MayAo’s factory is too small to handle all the labor and that there’s nothing illegal about pre-processing in independen­twarehouse­s.

“We are not 100 percent clean. You will always find some problems, but those are rare,” he said.

Some Thai seafood exporters have improved working conditions. Thai Union opened a large, clean peeling warehouse where 1,200 workers get subsidized meals and opportunit­ies for bonuses.

“I have more rights. I like it,” said Thet Paing Oo, 23, a migrant fromMyanma­r.

He said he spent six years working 15-hour shifts at shrimp sheds without a day off. Now, his salary has increased, and he gets one day off aweek.

Yu Wa, 35, also from Myanmar, teared up at memories of her previous shed, where shewas locked inside and paid by the kilogram, not per day.

“I am treated well and the boss is good,” she said. “It’s much better.”

 ??  ?? SAKCHAI LALIT/AP
SAKCHAI LALIT/AP
 ??  ?? ISABEL MENDOZA/AP
ISABEL MENDOZA/AP

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States