Texarkana Gazette

Trump changes course, approves California relief for six fires

- By Don Thompson and John Antczak

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — President Donald Trump’s administra­tion abruptly reversed course and approved California’s applicatio­n for disaster relief funds to clean up damage from six recent deadly and destructiv­e blazes that have scorched the state, Gov. Gavin Newsom said Friday.

“Just got off the phone with President Trump who has approved our Major Disaster Declaratio­n request. Grateful for his quick response,” Newsom said in a brief statement.

Neither he nor the White House gave details on why the administra­tion shifted positions only hours after it initially denied the state’s request for a declaratio­n that officials said could provide the state with hundreds of millions of dollars.

White House spokesman Judd Deere previously said California’s request “was not supported by the relevant data” needed for approval and that Trump agreed with a recommenda­tion from the Federal Emergency Management

Agency administra­tor to reject the declaratio­n.

“The Governor and (GOP) Leader (Kevin) McCarthy spoke and presented a convincing case and additional on-the-ground perspectiv­e for reconsider­ation leading the President to approve the declaratio­n,” Deere said in a statement after Trump’s change of heart.

McCarthy thanked Trump in a tweet for providing “the assistance needed to rebuild and repair,” though

his office did not respond to requests for more details on what changed.

Fellow Republican U.S. Rep. Tom McClintock said in a tweet that McCarthy told him “the President has committed to reverse FEMA’s decision … and help is on the way.”

Both congressme­n represent areas harmed by wildfires.

The state had planned to appeal the denial and believed it had a strong case, Brian Ferguson, a spokesman with the governor’s Office of Emergency Services, said before the reversal.

Newsom had asked for the major disaster declaratio­n on Sept. 28 to cover fires in Fresno, Los Angeles, Madera, Mendocino, San Bernardino, San Diego and Siskiyou counties.

The 30-page request described the disasters and pointed out that damage assessment­s were incomplete because the fires were still raging and access was difficult.

Federal major disaster declaratio­ns allow for cost-sharing for damage, cleanup and rebuilding between the state and federal government­s. They also activate relief programs led by FEMA.

The dispute surfaced as a representa­tive of one fire-stricken area warned that time was running out to clean up debris before rain and snow arrived, bringing the threat of mudslides and toxins being washed into a river watershed.

Denials of relief are rare and Newsom, a Democrat, has previously praised the Republican administra­tion for approving aid related to the fires and the coronaviru­s pandemic. The White House said Trump quickly approved wildfire relief that was supported by damage estimates.

Among the fires listed in the now-approved aid applicatio­n is the Creek Fire, which erupted in the Sierra Nevada on Sept. 4 and is 60% contained after burning 850 homes and more than 537 square miles (1,391 square kilometers) in Fresno and Madera counties.

Republican state Assemblyma­n Jim Patterson of Fresno said before the reversal that he had consulted with area congressio­nal offices.

“I have gotten encouragin­g response that FEMA is beginning to understand that they may have made a mistake here,” he said.

Patterson said, however, there was no time to waste on bureaucrat­ic finger-pointing and lauded the state Office of Emergency Services for pushing ahead with funding from a California disaster law in which the state will pay 75% and counties pay 25%.

“Obviously, the problem is our clock is ticking and time is running out, and we’re going to see rain pretty soon, snow pretty soon,” he told an online briefing. “If we don’t get into those areas quickly we’re going to miss this window and we’re going to end up seeing mudslides where this toxic debris goes into the San Joaquin River watershed.”

No major new fires were reported statewide early Friday, but warnings of dangerousl­y hot, dry and gusty conditions that can fan fires were expected to remain in effect until the evening. Nearly 9,000 firefighte­rs remain on the lines of 21 fires.

Near San Francisco’s internatio­nal airport, crews were battling a smoky grass fire burning on a highly visible hill with an iconic sign welcoming people to “South San Francisco.” The city of nearly 70,000 people said on social media that authoritie­s were on the scene and evacuation instructio­ns would follow if needed.

Numerous studies have linked bigger wildfires in America to climate change from the burning of coal, oil and gas.

 ?? Associated Press ?? Seen from Alameda, Calif., a grass fire burns Friday in South San Francisco, Calif. Portions of Northern California remain under red flag fire warnings because of high temperatur­es and dry winds.
Associated Press Seen from Alameda, Calif., a grass fire burns Friday in South San Francisco, Calif. Portions of Northern California remain under red flag fire warnings because of high temperatur­es and dry winds.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States