Is it wrong for the tabloids to run nude pho­tos of the Roy­als?

The Advance of Bucks County - - WORD ON THE STREET -

Arnie Leschner Wash­ing­ton Cross­ing I think it is wrong. It is to­tally dis­grace­ful -- even a ooyal needs some type of pri­vacy. On the other hand, they shouldn’t be out­side nude where some­body can snap a pic­ture!

Sue An­dreassi Wash­ing­ton Cross­ing They should leave them alone. They’re peo­ple just like us. They’re hu­man. They’re al­lowed to have fun. Caro­line Henry Lower Makefield It is wrong to post nude pho­tos of the royal fam­ily be­cause it por­trays them in a bad way and it does not re­spect them for who they are. But, it would not be re­spect­ful for any­one to have nude pho­tos posted of them.

An­drew Feller Lawrenceville, N.J. Un­like ev­ery­day celebri­ties, the royal fam­i­lies rep­re­sent some­thing higher and more pure and there­fore they should be ex­cluded from the same amount of at­ten­tion paid an ev­ery­day celebrity. Brenda Robin­son

Philadel­phia It’s wrong be­cause it’s the royal fam­ily. It’s kind of per­sonal. Gail McPhaden Lower Makefield I don’t think tabloids should print any top­less pho­tos. I think if The ooy­als re­ally are so news­wor­thy they should be very very cau­tious where they do things like that. I do think the tabloids should re­spect The ooy­als or any­one in a pub­lic po­si­tion.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from USA

© PressReader. All rights reserved.