Terry Tucker resigns as CEO of Families First
Nonprofits need to work with government, private sector, he says.
Terry Tucker has stepped down as CEO of Families First, almost a year to the day he started at the Atlanta nonprofit.
Tucker, 43, told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution that he resigned on Monday to pursue other endeavors that will likely keep him involved in the community.
“It’s really about where I wanted to spend my time,” said Tucker, who succeeded Kim Anderson as CEO in 2017.
“The solution will require more than nonprofits working in isolation,” he said.
“You need government, nonprofits and the private sector joined together in solving these complex problems. That’s the whole reason for the transition for me. You have to bring a bigger group together.”
Families First is a nonprofit that promotes family self-suf- ficiency and helps provide stable homes for children through adoption and fostercare. Services include parenting classes, education support, counseling services and supportive housing.
Families First started in 1890 as an orphanage on the Westside of the city on what is now the Spelman campus.
Tucker, who said he has always been an “entrepreneurial person,” praised the work of Families First but said it was best to leave the position to someone who could focus solely on the organization.
Families First is forming a search committee to vet candidates for the CEO position.
“In the meantime, Families First continues to focus on our mission of serving our clients and helping families and chil-
strated their products to the Secure, Accessible & Fair Elections Commission, a group of lawmakers, election directors and voters who are reviewing the state’s options before making a recommendation to the Georgia General Assembly for a replacement voting system.
About 100 people, including commission members, company representatives, lawmakers, security advocates and concerned citizens, turned out for the meeting at the Columbia County Exhibition Center.
Several of the voting systems relied on technology called ballot-marking devices.
Voters would make their choices on tablet-size or larger touchscreens. When they’re done, a paper ballot would be printed. Then voters would insert the ballot into an optical scanning machine for tabulation.
Georgia’s current election company, Election Systems & Software, emphasized that its voting system would be safe and accurate. Its ballot-marking devices were tested in Conyers last fall.
But voting integrity advocates say only verifiable, hand-marked paper ballots can be trusted. They say that having a computer fill out ballots and print them out along with bar codes to make them readable by tabulation computers could make them vulnerable to tampering.
“You aren’t just buying a piece of hardware. You need to know how the company is addressing security concerns,” said Kathy Rogers of ES&S. “Bar codes are fast and accurate.”
She said scanners that attempt to read printed ballots are more likely to make errors.
The company that proposed a hand-marked paper ballot, Clear Ballot, said it’s the most direct reflection of voters’ choices.
“Having an identical paper ballot for every voter that came into the polls is the best form of security that you could have,” said Bill Murphy, the director of sales for Clear Ballot.
Hart InterCivic proposed using printed ballots, but not with bar codes that include information about voters’ choices.
“We do not read a black box to determine the candidates and who you voted for,” said Dwayne Broxton, the regional sales director for Hart InterCivic.
Voters should be able to see a printed ballot and review it before it’s cast, said Wes Wagner of Unisyn Voting Solutions, which is also proposing a ballot-marking device for Georgia’s voting system.
“If they like their choices and they’re satisfied, they’re simply going to lay their ballot into a slot like a dollar bill into a soda machine,” Wagner said. “You can see it right there at the time of insertion.”
Most voting companies were reluctant to say how much their systems would cost the taxpayers of Georgia. Estimates start at $20 million and rise to more than $100 million. The expense of voting systems will become more clear when the state government solicits bids from companies early next year — and when legislators consider a bill to change the state’s voting system.
The voting machines from Smartmatic would read the words printed on the ballot, not bar codes.
“We’re doing optical character recognition on that tape and tabulating it,” said Ed Smith of Smartmatic.
The last company to present its voting technology would create a printed ballot that voters could see through a plastic screen, but they couldn’t touch it for up-close review.
“They can’t put their hands on it, but they can look at it through the window,” said Eric Coomer of Dominon Voting.
Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp, who created the SAFE Commission, said it’s clear to him that any replacement election system should include a paper record of votes.
“I like the idea of having a verifiable paper audit trail. I’ve said that many, many times,” said Kemp, a Republican running for governor against Democrat Stacey Abrams. “We’ll just let the commission and the Legislature see what’s available” before making a choice next year.
Former Families First CEO Terry Tucker
Wes Wagner of Unisyn Voting Solutions shows members of the Secure, Accessible & Fair Elections Commission how his company’s software can accurately record hand written military absentee ballots.