Faint drumbeat to impeach heard in House
WASHINGTON – On Wednesday, the 264th day of Donald Trump’s presidency, a Democratic congressman from Texas walked onto the floor of the House and presented proposed articles of impeachment against the commander in chief.
Trump has not necessarily committed a crime, the congressman said, but he has “undermined” the integrity of his office, “brought disrepute” on the presidency and “betrayed” the trust of Americans.
Congress, firmly in Republican control, barely blinked an eye.
The dynamic is likely to become a lot more familiar on Capitol Hill as the Trump presidency and investigations into the president’s associates grind on. Driven by an angry and energized base and insulated by the surety that Republican leaders will block their efforts, liberal Democrats are turning to one of Congress’ most symbolically freighted cudgels – impeachment – to add urgency to their long-standing criticisms of a president they say is unfit for office.
But with special counsel Robert S. Mueller III still pursuing his investigation, the efforts lack the weight of a prosecutor’s brief – and could become the objects of scorn, if not mockery.
“I believe that there is support across the length and breadth of this country,” the congressman, Al Green of Texas, said in an interview shortly before he went to the House floor Wednesday. “I do not take this lightly.”
Green’s proposed articles of impeachment have company. Rep. Steve Cohen, D-Tenn., plans to introduce his own version in the coming weeks. Rep. Brad Sherman, D-Calif., did so in July. And other Democrats in the House, where impeachment proceedings must begin, say they will not be far behind.
“Impeachment is what people understand,” Cohen said in an interview.
The resolutions have no real chance of advancing in the House – a fact that has not been lost on Democrats. Impeachment resolutions are typically referred to the House Judiciary Committee, which serves as the first place for debate and investigation into whether the proposed articles warrant a full hearing by the House. With the Republicans in firm control of the chamber – and the Judiciary Committee gavel – the chance that they would receive any real hearing there is next to none.
Thus far, Democratic leaders in the House have urged their colleagues to wait for investigators to do their work. For one, pushing impeachment too early could weaken Democrats’ hand if investigators turn up persuasive evidence of “high crimes and misdemeanors” that could compel bipartisan action. Too great a focus on impeachment could also distract from Democrats’ attempts to put forward a strong economic message.
“The Democratic Party had best be identified with something more than impeachment,” said Dennis J. Kucinich, a former Democratic member of the House.
In 2008, Kucinich proposed 35 articles of impeachment against President George W. Bush, focused primarily on his handling of the Iraq War. Kucinich cautioned that resolutions this time around might not yet be supported.
“There is tremendous animosity toward the president, and I understand it,” Kucinich said. “But I don’t know if there is a sufficient case to warrant a process as vigorous as impeachment.”
Others offered a different warning: In exciting their own base, which they would need to regain control of the House next year, Democrats run the risk of igniting Trump’s.
Something similar happened to President Bill Clinton when he was embroiled in an impeachment fight in the late 1990s. His poll numbers went up, and Republicans lost seats in the House.
Recent public polling has found that about 40 percent of Americans support impeachment, but Bill Burton, a former aide in the Obama White House and Democratic campaign operative, said that much of that support was pocketed in blue-leaning districts.
“There is a growing appetite for impeachment in the most Democratic parts of the country,” he said. “But what is good for downtown L.A. is not what’s good for Bakersfield.”
Those introducing the articles say they felt obliged to act. Their efforts got a lift on Wednesday when Tom Steyer, a prominent Democratic donor from California, wrote a letter demanding that lawmakers and Democratic candidates support the president’s removal.
“I’ve got a very safe district that is very supportive of impeachment, I believe,” said Cohen, whose Memphis district is majority black. “And if I can’t come out for impeachment, then how can I expect these Republicans come out for impeachment?”