Vick’s fate to be determined by ‘tough but fair’ judge
RICHMOND, Va. — The judge who will determine how much time Michael Vick spends in prison has shown little mercy over the years for high-profile defendants.
Nobody knows this better than defense lawyer Robert H. Smallenberg.
In 2004, he represented a city official who stole more than $1 million from Richmond taxpayers. He was well aware U.S. District Judge Henry E. Hudson had earned a reputation for handing down stiff sentences.
“Tough but fair” is the description most often heard from lawyers who appear before Hudson, who owns a bichon frise dog and declined to be interviewed.
“He’s a good trial judge, but on sentencing he tends to be in the middle or upper range of the sentencing guidelines,” said attorney Murray Janus. “A lot of judges start at the low end. Not Judge Hudson.”
Still, Smallenberg was caught off-guard by how hard Hudson came down on his client. The judge sentenced Robert Evans to 10 years in prison — double what was called for under federal sentencing guidelines — declaring “the abuse of trust here is absolutely immeasurable.”
“I wasn’t surprised he went above the guidelines, but I was surprised he went that far,” Smallenberg said Thursday.
Based on his personal experience, Smallenberg said he won’t be surprised if Hudson takes a similarly tough position in the case of NFL star Vick, who is scheduled to plead guilty to a federal dogfighting conspiracy charge Monday.
A government official, speaking on condition of anonymity because terms of the plea agreement are not final, has told The Associated Press prosecutors will recommend a sentence of one year to 18 months. However, the maximum sentence is five years, and Hudson is not bound by any recommendation or by the federal sentencing guidelines.
Vick’s lawyers will try for the shortest possible sentence.
Rob Wagner, who leads the federal public defender’s office in Richmond, said defense attorneys in Hudson’s courtroom face a rough road when arguing mitigating factors should result in a sentence below the guideline range.
“You know when you get Judge Hudson he’s going to take a tough line in sentencing,” he said.
Since his indictment in July, the Atlanta Falcons quarterback has become a public symbol of animal abuse. His alreadytarnished image suffered even more when two co-defendants said Vick participated in killing at least eight underperforming pit bulls.
Those men and a third codefendant have pleaded guilty and were prepared to testify against Vick had the case gone to trial.
Although the Vick case is the most sensational one to come before Hudson since President Bush appointed him to the federal bench in 2002, he’s handled cases involving locally prominent people.
In 2005, he sentenced former state lawmaker Fenton Bland to four years and nine months in prison for conspiracy to commit bank fraud, rejecting a defense plea for a reduced sentence so Bland could better care for his two young children.
“Was I surprised? No,” said Janus, who represented Bland.
Janus also represented H. Louis Salomonsky, a prominent Richmond real estate developer who pleaded guilty to trying to bribe a city councilwoman. Hudson sentenced Salomonsky to two years. Even though prosecutors and Janus asked for a reduction to one year, Hudson only would cut the term to 18 months.