Lenient parenting is a mistake for adopted children
We have an adopted girl who came to us when she was 4 years old. She is very difficult to handle and does pretty much what she pleases. For us to make her obey would be very unpleasant for her, and frankly, we don’t feel we have the right to do that. She has been through a lot in her short life. Besides, we’re not her real parents. Do you think she’ll be OK if we just give her a lot of love and attention?
Dobson: I’m afraid you have a formula for serious problems with this girl later on. The danger is in seeing yourselves as substitute or stand-in parents who don’t have the right to lead her. That is a mistake. Since you have legally adopted this child, you are her “real” parents, and your failure to see it that way may be setting up the defiant behavior you mentioned.
It is a common error made by parents of older adopted children. They pity their youngsters too much to confront them. They feel that life has already been too hard on them and they must not make things worse by discipline and occasional punishment. As a result, they are tentative and permissive with a child who is crying out for leadership.
Transplanted children have the same needs for guidance and discipline as those remaining with their biological parents. One of the surest ways to make them feel insecure is to treat them as though they are different, unusual or brittle. If the parents view such a child as an unfortunate waif to be shielded, he will tend to see himself that way too.
Parents of sick and handicapped children often make this same mistake. They find discipline harder to implement because of the tenderness they feel for that child. Thus, a boy or a girl with a heart condition or some serious illness can become a little terror, simply because the usual behavioral boundaries are not established and defended.
It must be remembered that the need to be led and governed is almost universal in childhood, and it isn’t lessened by other problems and difficulties in life. In some cases, the desire for boundaries is actually increased by other troubles, for it is through loving control that parents build security and a sense of personal worth in a child.
Returning to the question, I advise you to love that little girl like crazy — and hold her to the same standards of behavior that you would your own flesh and blood. Remem- ber, you are her parents!
Since you disapprove of public school sexeducation programs as currently designed, who do you think should tell children the facts of life and when should that instruction begin?
Dobson: For those parents who are able to handle the instructional process correctly, the responsibility for sex education should be retained in the home. There is a growing trend for all aspects of education to be taken from their hands (or the role is deliberately forfeited by them). This is unwise. Particularly in the matter of sex education, the best approach is one that begins casually and naturally in early childhood and extends through the years, according
to a policy of openness, frankness and honesty. Only parents can provide this lifetime training — being there when the questions arise and the desire for information is evidenced.
Unfortunately, moms and dads often fail to do the job. Some are too sexually inhibited to present the subject with poise, or they may lack the necessary technical knowledge of the human body. Another common mistake is to wait until puberty is knocking at the door and then try to initiate a desperate, tension-filled conversation that embarrasses the kid and exhausts the parents.
If this is the way sex education is going to be handled, there has to be another alternative to consider.