The five stages of reacting to a nuke test
The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea announced Tuesday that it had successfully tested another nuclear bomb, its fourth since 2006, and independent reports of man- made seismic activity seem to confirm the claim.
There’s no real North Korea policy in place inWashington; the Obama administration has pursued a strategy of “strategic patience,” which essentially amounts to waiting for either North Korea or its benefactor China to voluntarily do something productive. So when North Korea forcesWashington to pay attention, even if it’s only for a few days, all the U. S. government can do is grieve. And it happens in all five stages. ( With apologies to Elisabeth Kubler- Ross.)
Stage 1: Denial. The U. S. government’s first reaction to any North Korean nuclear test or missile launch is to acknowledge reports of the incident but defer full comment until all the data comes in, which can take days.
The bigger denial is the U. S. government’s view of North Korea: State Department spokesman John Kirby said late Tuesday that “we will not accept it as a nuclear state.” North Korea has been a nuclear state since 2006. According to the Institute for Science and International Security, it could have enough nuclear material for 79 bombs by 2020.
Stage 2: Anger. In the days following a North Korea provocation, the U. S. will lead the international community in a very public condemnation of Pyongyang’s utter disregard for United Nations Security Council resolutions, its breaking of its own international commitments such as the September 2005 agreement to denuclearize, and its flouting of international norms regarding safety and security in Northeast Asia.
Presidential candidates will direct anger at the Clinton administration for crafting an agreement in 1994 with Pyongyang that critics saw as a failure.
Stage 3: Bargaining. Once the outrage subsides a bit, the expert community and the media, collectively known as the chattering class, will resume a familiar discussion about whether China can be persuaded to intervene and solve the North Korea problem. China will be bargaining as well, working to protect North Korea from harsh reprisals and other punitive measures that might be advocated by countries like Japan or South Korea. The question that comes up perennially is what the U. S. can do to press Beijing to take a harder line toward Kim Jong Un. The answer always comes back the same. China highly prizes North Korea stability and is unlikely to do anything too substantial to tamp down the provocations.
Stage 4: Depression. Until this recent test, there had been signs that North Korea was opening up, albeit cautiously. There has been a new inter- Korean dialogue and family reunions were recently allowed. The Chinese government had recently reached out to North Korea’s leadership after a long cooling- off period following the execution of their main interlocutor, Kim’s uncle Jang Song Thaek. Even the Japanese had some new initiatives inmind to work with North Korea. All of that will now be placed on indefinite hold. North Korea’s provocations have become so routine that after the international community goes through the motions, everyone eventually reverts back to the status quo. North Korea will likely avoid any tough new sanctions, as it has in the past. After a couple of months, quiet meetingsmay be held to re- establish back- channel discussions through experts and semi- official government representatives. This iswhat theU. S. did in 2013, the last timeNorth Korea tested a nuke.
North Korea’s leaders will continue to test their ballistic missile and nuclear technology; they have to in order to progress technologically and assert their relevance. Also, there’s not much theU. S. can or will do about it, but hope that Kim JongUn has enough interest in self- preservation that he continues to perpetrate violence only against his own people.