The Denver Post

Senate to take up bill for more scrutiny

The proposed legislatio­n for more rigorous procedures for Syrians and Iraqis looms large in an election year.

- By Richard Lardner

The Senate will consider new rigorous screening procedures for Syrian and Iraqi refugees seeking to enter the United States as national security looms large for voters in an election year.

Propelled by the Islamic State terrorist group’s attacks in Paris, the GOP-backed legislatio­n raced through the House in November with 289 votes. That vetoproof margin included 47 Democrats despite the Obama administra­tion’s opposition to the measure. The legislatio­n will have a much harder time making it through the Senate in the week ahead.

Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., needs at least six Democrats to join all 54 Republican­s to approve a motion clearing the bill for final passage in the 100-member chamber.

The Senate’s top Democrat, Harry Reid of Nevada, said last year that was not going to happen. Even if it did, President Barack Obama has pledged to veto the bill if it got to him.

The upshot may be more of the same on Capitol Hill: A war of words, with Republican­s blasting Obama for failing to do what they see as necessary to secure the United States and Democrats accusing the GOP of fear-mongering to score points with voters.

Some of the key points to know about the Syrian-Iraqi refugee legislatio­n:

• The Islamic State controls territory in Syria and Iraq. As a result of the terrorists’ harsh, uncompromi­sing rule, people in those areas have tried to flee and make it to the United States. The House-passed American Security Against Foreign Enemies Act is rooted in concerns the current process of screening refugees is inadequate and could allow a terrorist to be admitted into the United States.

The legislatio­n would order FBI background checks for Syrian and Iraqi refugees and require that the FBI, Homeland Security Department and the director of National Intelligen­ce certify that each refugee is not a security threat. The bill’s requiremen­ts would effectivel­y suspend admissions of Syrian and Iraqi refugees.

Republican­s pointed to the arrest this month of two Iraqi refugees with suspected links to terrorism as one more example of the flawed vetting system.

• The White House said Obama would veto the House bill. The legislatio­n “would provide no meaningful additional security for the American people,” it said in a Nov. 18 statement.

Refugees of all nationalit­ies, including Syrians and Iraqis, already face a demanding screening process, and the legislatio­n “would unacceptab­ly hamper our efforts to assist some of the most vulnerable people in the world,” the statement said. The White House said more than 2,100 Syrian refugees have been admitted to the United States since 2001 and not one has been arrested or deported on terrorism-related grounds.

• After the House passed the bill Nov. 19, Reid predicted it would die in the Senate. “Don’t worry, it won’t get passed,” Reid told reporters.

A final decision on how the Democrats will proceed is expected Wednesday at their weekly caucus meeting.

Without support from Democrats, the math doesn’t work for McConnell. He needs a half-dozen Democrats to pass a motion to proceed and eventually allow a vote on the legislatio­n. Thirteen more Democrats would be needed to reach a veto-proof tally.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States