WOMEN SUE UBER, AL­LEG­ING AS­SAULT

The Denver Post - - BUSINESS -

FRAN­CISCO» Two women are SAN su­ing Uber, al­leg­ing that in­ad­e­quate driver back­ground checks and mon­i­tor­ing left them and thou­sands of oth­ers vul­ner­a­ble to sex­ual as­sault.

The women from Florida and Cal­i­for­nia are not iden­ti­fied in the fed­eral law­suit filed Tues­day in San Fran­cisco. Each al­leges be­ing sex­u­ally as­saulted by Uber drivers who gave them rides home.

Uber says it re­ceived the com­plaint Tues­day and is re­view­ing it. “These al­le­ga­tions are im­por­tant to us and we take them very se­ri­ously,” the ride-hail­ing firm said in a state­ment.

The law­suit seeks class-ac­tion sta­tus and al­leges that Uber has done noth­ing mean­ing­ful to stem an “ex­po­nen­tial in­crease” in sex­ual ha­rass­ment and as­sault re­ports. It al­leges that Uber mar­kets to young women trav­el­ing alone and puts prof­its over their safety.

“Over the last seven years, Uber has done ev­ery­thing pos­si­ble to con­tinue us­ing low-cost, woe­fully in­ad­e­quate back­ground checks on drivers and has failed to mon­i­tor drivers for any vi­o­lent or in­ap­pro­pri­ate con­duct af­ter they are hired,” the law­suit states.

It asks the court for un­spec­i­fied da­m­ages to com­pen­sate the women, and also seeks court-or­dered safety mea­sures in­clud­ing fin­ger­print back­ground checks for drivers and a panic but­ton on the Uber app that would alert the com­pany and au­thor­i­ties to safety prob­lems.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from USA

© PressReader. All rights reserved.