The Morning Journal (Lorain, OH)

Neandertha­ls in California? Maybe so, provocativ­e story says

- By Malcolm Ritter

A startling new report asserts that the first known Americans arrived much, much earlier than scientists thought — more than 100,000 years ago and maybe they were Neandertha­ls.

If true, the finding would far surpass the widely accepted date of about 15,000 years ago.

Researcher­s say a site in Southern California shows evidence of humanlike behavior from about 130,000 years ago, when bones and teeth of an elephantli­ke mastodon were evidently smashed with rocks.

The earlier date means the bone-smashers were not necessaril­y members of our own species, Homo sapiens. The researcher­s speculate that these early California­ns could have instead been species known only from fossils in Europe, Africa and Asia: Neandertha­ls, a little-known group called Denisovans, or another human forerunner named Homo erectus.

“The very honest answer is, we don’t know,” said Steven Holen, lead author of the paper and director of the nonprofit Center for American Paleolithi­c Research in Hot Springs, South Dakota.

No remains of any individual­s were found.

Whoever they were, they could have arrived by land or sea. They might have come from Asia via the Beringea land bridge that used to connect Siberia to Alaska, or maybe come across by watercraft along the Beringea coast or across open water to North America, before turning southward to California, Holen said in a telephone interview.

Holen and others present their evidence in a paper released Wednesday by the journal Nature.

Not surprising­ly, the report was met by skepticism from other experts who don’t think there is enough proof.

The research dates back to the winter of 1992-3. The site was unearthed during a routine dig by researcher­s during a freeway expansion project in San Diego. Analysis of the find was delayed to assemble the right expertise, said Tom Demere, curator of paleontolo­gy at the San Diego Natural History Museum, another author of the paper.

The Nature analysis focuses on remains from a single mastodon, and five stones found nearby. The mastodon’s bones and teeth were evidently placed on two stones used as anvils and smashed with three stone hammers, to get at nutritious marrow and create raw material for tools.

Patterns of damage on the limb bones looked like what happened in experiment­s when elephant bones were smashed with rocks. And the bones and stones were found in two areas, each roughly centered on what’s thought to be an anvil.

The stones measured about 8 inches to 12 inches long and weighed up to 32 pounds. They weren’t handcrafte­d tools, Demere said. The users evidently found them and brought them to the site.

The excavation also found a mastodon tusk in a vertical position, extending down into older layers, which may indicate it had been jammed into the ground as a marker or to create a platform, Demere said.

 ?? SAN DIEGO NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM VIA AP ?? This photo provided by the San Diego Natural History Museum shows a concentrat­ion of fossil bone and rock at an excavation site in San Diego The positions of the femur heads, one up and one down, broken in the same manner next to each other is unusual....
SAN DIEGO NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM VIA AP This photo provided by the San Diego Natural History Museum shows a concentrat­ion of fossil bone and rock at an excavation site in San Diego The positions of the femur heads, one up and one down, broken in the same manner next to each other is unusual....

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States