Re­ject­ing Trump, both par­ties’ lead­ers see or­derly elec­tion

The Times Herald (Norristown, PA) - - WEATHER - By Lisa Mas­caro, Aamer Mad­hani and Kevin Frek­ing

WASH­ING­TON » Pres­i­dent Don­ald Trump’s re­fusal to com­mit to a peace­ful trans­fer of power if he loses the elec­tion drew swift blow­back Thurs­day from both par­ties in Congress, and law­mak­ers were al­ready turn­ing to un­prece­dented steps to en­sure he can’t ig­nore the vote of the peo­ple.

Con­gres­sional lead­ers, in­clud­ing Se­nate Ma­jor­ity Leader Mitch McCon­nell and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, re­jected Trump’s sug­ges­tion that he’d “see what hap­pens” be­fore agree­ing to any elec­tion out­come.

Many other law­mak­ers — in­clud­ing from Trump’s own Repub­li­can Party — vowed to en­sure vot­ers’ wishes are fol­lowed ahead of In­au­gu­ra­tion Day in Jan­uary. And some Democrats were tak­ing ac­tion, in­clud­ing for­mally ask­ing Trump’s de­fense sec­re­tary, na­tional se­cu­rity ad­viser and at­tor­ney gen­eral to de­clare they’ll sup­port the Nov. 3 re­sults.

“The Pres­i­dent can’t suc­cess­fully refuse to ac­cept the re­sults of the elec­tion without a num­ber of very se­nior of­fi­cials aid­ing him,” said Rep. Elissa Slotkin of Michigan, a former CIA an­a­lyst, one of two con­gress­women be­hind let­ters to the na­tion’s top na­tional se­cu­rity of­fi­cials.

Mean­while, McCon­nell, the GOP Se­nate leader, said in a tweet: “The winner of the Novem­ber 3rd elec­tion will be in­au­gu­rated on Jan­uary 20th.” He said, “There will be an or­derly tran­si­tion just as there has been ev­ery four years since 1792.”

Said Pelosi, “Calm down, Mr. Pres­i­dent.”

“You are in the United States of Amer­ica. It is a democ­racy,” she said, re­mind­ing Trump this is not North Korea, Rus­sia or other coun­tries with strong­man lead­ers he ad­mires. “So why don’t you just try for a moment to honor our oath of of­fice to the Con­sti­tu­tion of the United States.”

Trump’s at­tacks on the up­com­ing vote — al­most without mod­ern prece­dent in the U.S. — are hit­ting amid the tu­mult of the campaign, as par­ti­san ten­sions rage and more Amer­i­cans than ever are plan­ning to vote by mail be­cause of the coronaviru­s pan­demic.

It’s not the first time he has sowed doubts about the vot­ing process. But his in­creased ques­tion­ing weeks in ad­vance of any re­sult is set­ting off alarms ahead of an Elec­tion Day like al­most no other. Even without signs of il­le­gal­ity, re­sults could be de­layed be­cause of the pan­demic, leav­ing the na­tion ex­posed to groups or for­eign coun­tries seek­ing to sow dis­cord.

Trump is fan­ning the un­cer­tainty as he floats the­o­ries the elec­tion may be “rigged” if he loses, echo­ing warn­ings he made ahead of the 2016 vot­ing — even though past elections have not shown sub­stan­tial ev­i­dence of fraud from mail-in vot­ing.

Dur­ing a Wed­nes­day news con­fer­ence, Trump said, “We’re go­ing to have to see what hap­pens,” re­spond­ing to a ques­tion about com­mit­ting to the re­sults. “You know that I’ve been com­plain­ing very strongly about the bal­lots, and the bal­lots are a disaster.”

Re­ac­tion to his com­ment was strong from Capi­tol Hill — from both par­ties.

Lind­sey Gra­ham, a Trump ally and the GOP chair of the Se­nate Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee, told “Fox & Friends” on Thurs­day, “If Repub­li­cans lose we will ac­cept the re­sult. If the Supreme Court rules in favor of Joe Bi­den, I will ac­cept that re­sult.”

Rep. Liz Cheney of Wy­oming, a mem­ber of the House GOP lead­er­ship, tweeted: “The peace­ful trans­fer of power is en­shrined in our Con­sti­tu­tion and fun­da­men­tal to the sur­vival of our Repub­lic. Amer­ica’s lead­ers swear an oath to the Con­sti­tu­tion. We will up­hold that oath.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from USA

© PressReader. All rights reserved.