Romney foes angry over ‘very ugly’ads
Ongoing GOP battle fueled by bitterness
NEW ORLEANS | The millions of dollars spent by Mitt Romney’s allies on TV ads attacking his two main rivals have helped the former Massachusetts governor pull ahead in the GOP presidential race. The resulting bitterness, however, is making it hard for him to lock down the nomination and end the party fighting that delights Democrats.
Republican insiders say Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich are fuming over the hard-hitting 30-second spots that sent them tumbling after they gained early leads in Iowa, Florida, Michigan and other states.
Every election bruises some feelings. But campaign veterans say Mr. Santorum and Mr. Gingrich feel the commercials were pointedly unfair, and that’s a big reason they keep fighting despite Mr. Romney’s significant lead in delegates and pleas from some Republican leaders to close ranks and focus on President Obama.
“The Romney folks have run a pretty ugly campaign,” said Mike Mckenna, a Republican strategist and pollster who is unaffiliated in the presidential race. “It’s been very personal, it’s been very ugly, it’s been very hostile. There’s a lot of bad blood.”
Mr. Santorum and Mr. Gingrich, or political action committees that back them, have mounted their own attacks against Mr. Romney, of course. But a pro-romney super PAC, Restore Our Future, has swamped them in fundraising and spending. First it buried Mr. Gingrich in an avalanche of attack ads in Iowa and Florida, then it hammered Mr. Santorum in Michigan, Ohio and elsewhere.
These committees can spend unlimited money supporting candidates as long as they don’t coordinate with the candidates, yet are required to reveal little about who they are.
One or two ads in particular seemed to infuriate them, and their bitter complaints failed to persuade the former Massachusetts governor to demand an end to the ads.
An ad repeatedly aired by the pro-romney committee claimed that Mr. Gingrich had cosponsored legislation “that would have given $60 million a year to a U.N. program supporting China’s brutal one-child policy.” The strong implication was that Mr. Gingrich, as House speaker, had promoted abortions in China.
The legislation, however, specifically barred U.S. funds from being used for “the performance of involuntary sterilization or abortion or to coerce any person to accept family planning.”
Mr. Gingrich also is angry over ads saying he paid a $300,000 fine to settle the House ethics case filed against him in the mid-1990s. Mr. Gingrich says it was a negotiated reimbursement of the investigation’s costs.
Mr. Santorum has complained often about a pro-romney ad that accused Mr. Santorum of backing legislation to allow felons to vote. Mr. Santorum, a former senator from Pennsylvania, said he would allow them to vote only after completing their sentences, probation and parole.
In a Jan. 16 debate, Mr. Santorum said Mr. Romney should demand that the “inaccurate” ad be taken down. Mr. Santorum said Mr. Romney, when governor, tolerated a more liberal state law, which allowed ex-felons to vote while still on probation or parole.
Mr. Romney said violent criminals should never be allowed to vote again. He noted that he has been the target of attack ads, too. He said he had no control over super PACS, which by law must operate independently from official campaigns.