Murder, mayhem and illegal entry
At the funeral of Iofemi Hightower, her classmate Mecca Ali wore a T-shirt with the slogan: “Tell Me Why They Had To Die.” “They” are Miss Hightower, Dashon Harvey and Terrance Aeriel, three young citizens of Newark, N.J., lined up against a schoolyard wall, forced to kneel, and then shot in the head.
Miss Ali poses an interesting question. No one can say why they “had” to die, but it ought to be possible to advance theories as to what factors make violent death in Newark a more likely proposition than it should be. That’s usually what happens when lurid cases make national headlines: When Matthew Shepard was beaten and hung on a fence in Wyoming, Frank Rich wrote in The New York Times that it was merely the latest stage in a “war” against homosexuals loosed by the forces of intolerance; the Shepard murder was dramatized in plays and movies and innumerable songs by Melissa Etheridge, Elton John, Peter, Paul and Mary, etc.
The fact that this vile crucifixion was a grisly one-off and that American gays have never been less at risk from getting bashed did not deter pundits and politicians and lobby groups galore from arguing that this freak case demonstrated the need for special legislation.
By contrast, there have been a succession of prominent stories with one common feature that the very same pundits, politicians and lobby groups have a curious reluctance to go anywhere near. In a report headlined “Sorrow And Anger As Newark Buries Slain Youth,” the limpidly tasteful New York Times prose prioritized “sorrow” over “anger,” and offered only the following reference to the perpetrators: “The authorities have said robbery appeared to be the motive. Three suspects — two 15-year-olds and a 28-yearold construction worker from Peru — have been arrested.” So this Peruvian guy was here on a Green Card? Or did he apply for a temporary construction-work visa from the U.S. Embassy in Lima?
Not exactly. Jose Carranza is an “undocumented” immigrant. His criminal career did not begin with the triple murder he is accused of, nor with the barroom assault from earlier this year, nor with the 31 counts of aggravated sexual assault relating to the rape of a 5-year old child, for which Carranza had been released on bail. (His $50,000 bail on the assault charge, and $150,000 bail on the child-rape charges have been revoked — or at least until New Jersey authorities decide to release him for the mass-murder charges on $250,000 bail.) No, Carranza’s criminal career in the U.S. began when he decided to live in this country unlawfully.
Jose Carranza isn’t exactly a member of an exclusive club. Violent crime committed by fine upstanding members of the Undocumented-American community is now a routine feature of American life. But who cares? In 2002, as the “Washington Sniper” piled up his body count, “experts” lined up to tell the media he was most likely an “angry white male,” a “macho hunter” or an “icy loner.” When the icy loner turned out to be a black Muslim called Muhammad plus an illegal immigrant from Jamaica, the only angry white males around were the lads in America’s newsrooms who were noticeably reluctant to abandon their thesis: Early editions of the New York Times speculated Muhammad and Malvo were being sought for “possible ties to ‘skinhead militia’ groups,” which seemed a somewhat improbable alliance given the size of Muhammad’s hair in the only available mugshot.
As for his illegal sidekick, John Lee Malvo was detained and released by the Immigration and Naturalization Service in breach of their own procedures.
America has a high murder rate: Murder is definitely one of the jobs Americans can do. But that ties young Malvo to Jose Carranza: He’s just another killer let loose in this country to kill Americans by the bureaucracy’s boundless sensitivity toward the “undocumented.”
Will the Newark murders change anything? Will there be an Ioefemi Hightower Act of Congress like the Matthew Shepard Act passed by the House of Representatives? No.
Three thousand people died on September 11, 2001, in a mass murder facilitated by the illegal immigration support structures in this country, and, if that didn’t rouse Americans to action, another trio of victims seems unlikely to tip the scales. As Michelle Malkin documented in her book “Invasion,” four of the killers boarded the plane with photo ID obtained through the “undocumented worker” network at the 7Eleven in Falls Church, Va. That’s to say, officialdom”s tolerance of the illegal immigration shadowstate enabled September 11.
And what did we do? Not only did we not shut it down, we en- shrined the shadow-state’s charade as part of the new tough postslaughter security procedures. Go take a flight from Newark Airport. The Transportation Security Administration guy will ask for your driver’s license, glance at the name and picture, and hand it back to you.
Feel safer? The terrorists could pass that test, and on Tuesday morning they did: 19 foreign “visitors” had, between them, 63 valid U.S. driver’s licenses. Did government agencies then make it harder to obtain lawful photo ID? No. Since September 11, the likes of Maryland and New Mexico have joined those states that as a matter of public policy issue legal driver’s licenses to illegal immigrants. So every time you stand in line shuffling along while the TSA guy examines driver’s license after driver’s license you have the privilege of knowing you’re participating in a grand national charade.
Newark is the logical end point of these policies. It is a failed city: 60 percent of its children are raised in households without fathers. Into that vacuum pour all kinds of alternative authority structures: Carranza is alleged to have committed his crime with various teenage members of MS13, a gang with origins in El Salvador’s civil war of the 1980s that now operates in some 30 states. In its toughest redoubts, immigrants don’t assimilate with America, America assimilates to the immigrants, and a Fairfax, Va., teenager finds himself getting hacked at by machete wielders.
One could, I suppose, regard this as one of those unforeseen incremental consequences that happens in the darkest shadows of society. But that doesn”t extend to Newark’s official status as an illegal-immigrant “sanctuary city.” Like Los Angeles, New York and untold others, Newark has formally erased the distinction between U.S. citizens and the armies of the undocumented. This is the active collusion by multiple cities and states in the subversion of U.S. sovereignty. In Newark, N.J., it means an illegal-immigrant child rapist is free to murder on a Saturday night. In Somerville, Mass., it means two deaf girls are raped by MS-13 members. And in Falls Church, Va., it means Saudi Wahhabists figuring out that, if the “sanctuary nation” (in Michelle Malkin’s phrases) offers such rich pickings to imported killers and imported gangs, why not to jihadists?
“Tell Me Why They Had To Die”? Hard to answer. But tell me why, no matter how many Jose Carranzas it spawns, the nationwide undocumented-immigration protection program erected by this country’s political class remains untouchable and ever-expanding.
Mark Steyn is the senior contributing editor for Hollinger Inc. Publications, senior North American columnist for Britain’s Telegraph Group, North American editor for the Spectator, and a nationally syndicated columnist.