Maverick? McCain’s on board the global warming train
If John McCain were truly a maverick, he would publicly break from the politically correct culture that demands obedience to its global warming narrative. But sadly, he continues to do the opposite.
Liberals have denominated Mr. McCain a maverick because he has taken so many positions contradictory to his party’s platform and to the conservative ideology that undergirds it. Now that he is the putative Republican nominee, you don’t hear much about his maverick nature, but it’s certainly not because he’s changed his ways in opposing his party.
Two week, he affirmed his commitment to comprehensive immigration reform, even though earlier he stepped back from it to curry favor with conservatives. One wonders what other shoes will inevitably drop should he win the presidency, especially because he has indicated he would most likely be a one-termer.
Will he revert to his visceral revulsion to the Bush supply-side tax cuts? Many supply-siders, after taking Mr. McCain to the woodshed on the issue, assure us he can be trusted on it.
If so, their efforts will redound to the benefit of the economy and nation should Mr. McCain win the election. But some of these same supply-side advocates insist we shouldn’t expect him to move rightward on too many other issues.
Sorry, but I reject that zerosum thinking, as should my fellow supplysiders; they certainly do in the realm of tax policy. While I will vote for Mr. McCain against either Democratic opponent, I don’t believe we should abandon efforts to reform the “reformer” on other issues besides taxes. Are we supposed to declare a moratorium on the expression of our principles for fear it could damage his electability?
If conservatives don’t make an effort to hold Mr. McCain accountable for his liberal proclivities, then no one will, to the guaranteed detriment of the national interest. In fact, pushing him to the right while we still have a chance will enhance his electability.
Which brings me back to the subject that inspired this column: Mr. McCain’s regrettable upcoming speech outlining his vision to combat global warming.
In a preview of the speech, CNN reports that Mr. McCain will say: “We stand warned by serious and credible scientists across the world that time is short and the dangers are great. The most relevant question now is whether our own government is equal to the challenge.”
No, Mr. McCain, the most relevant question is whether political leaders will have the diligence to study this issue and the integrity and courage to stand up to the propaganda of the enviro-bullies. The question is whether you can be a maverick where it counts.
It is not Earth’s ecosystem that hangs in the balance, but America’s future. Those whose vision isn’t blurred by green-colored glasses and the temptation to win accolades from the leftist-dominated culture can see that the global push to “save the planet” is more about destroying capitalism, private property and Western culture than sound, sciencebased environmental stewardship. Never mind the staggering contradiction that free market economies produce cleaner environs.
Indeed, I hate to break it to some of my fellow evangelical Christians who are falling into the trap along with Mr. McCain, but the global warming proselytes don’t share your worldview. Do you realize you are jumping in bed with those who are promoting a pantheistic deification of the environment and a diminution of the dignity of human beings created in God’s image?
Contrary to the mandated script from the warming zealots, there is plenty of credible dissent in the scientific community about global warming, particularly man’s role in it. Much of this dissent comes from scientists in fields related to weather studies. Imagine that.
The fact that the envirochurch fathers have “outlawed” dissenting opinion and slander those offering it tells us something fishy is afoot.
And for you McCain supporters who think the only issues that matter are the war and taxes, not to mention abortion and immigration — all of which are incalculably important — I urge you not to underestimate the gravity of the global warming issue and the potentially devastating consequences of rolling over on it.
If Republicans also acquiesce to this false religion and its required “good works,” we are headed toward a path of economic and societal destruction in the name of saving the planet.
It’s time for Newt Gingrich to get off that couch with Nancy Pelosi and for John McCain to jump off this insidious global warming train that might as well be armed with enemy bombs and aimed at the heart of this nation and its economy.
David Limbaugh is a nationally syndicated columnist.