A view that needs no ad­di­tional ex­po­sure

The Washington Times Weekly - - Letters To The Editor -

Re: your “Two Views on Teen Preg­nancy” page in the Com­men­tary sec­tion of the Sept. 15 edi­tion (page 34), what is wrong with you peo­ple? How could you pro­vide a fo­rum for the pro­pa­ganda of Planned Par­ent­hood to trot out its dis­tor­tions and twisted rea­son­ing? Do you be­lieve this makes you look fair and bal­anced on the is­sue? I see you as gullible in an at­tempt to be nu­anced.

Are you mov­ing away from your con­ser­va­tive roots? I will be watch­ing to see if this is a sin­gle aber­ra­tion or part of a trend with new ed­i­to­rial di­rec­tion. Jim Moyer Wood­burn, Ore­gon

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from USA

© PressReader. All rights reserved.