A view that needs no additional exposure
Re: your “Two Views on Teen Pregnancy” page in the Commentary section of the Sept. 15 edition (page 34), what is wrong with you people? How could you provide a forum for the propaganda of Planned Parenthood to trot out its distortions and twisted reasoning? Do you believe this makes you look fair and balanced on the issue? I see you as gullible in an attempt to be nuanced.
Are you moving away from your conservative roots? I will be watching to see if this is a single aberration or part of a trend with new editorial direction. Jim Moyer Woodburn, Oregon